From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: So many trash-posts! "gnu.emacs.help.moderated"? (ditto comp.emacs?) Date: 17 Sep 2005 00:51:31 -0400 Organization: PANIX -- Public Access Networks Corp. Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126933019 31246 80.91.229.2 (17 Sep 2005 04:56:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 06:56:58 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGUjq-0001bj-0s for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:55:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGUjn-0007BW-N2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:55:43 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs Original-Lines: 22 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: panix3.panix.com Original-X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1126932691 24603 166.84.1.3 (17 Sep 2005 04:51:31 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:133953 comp.emacs:90117 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:29511 Archived-At: Looks like the spam/real-stuff ratio is getting to what, 5? 10? Other newsgroups have in the past gone moderated. Good or bad idea for the emacs groups? What would be the difficulties? How much of a PITA to simply toss out posts based purely on subject-lines? Or, might one of these email spam-catchers work for tossing at least the ones with subject-lines that aren't readible, not ascii, etc? We gotta do *something*, huh? Other ideas? David