From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 08:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <863691n4xl.wl-me@enzu.ru> <86blno9yle.wl-me@enzu.ru> <87d0845msg.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h7xgjasw.fsf@yahoo.com> <875zdwjais.fsf@yahoo.com> <6a198677-41b6-4dbd-39d0-2b01550d53cf@yandex.ru> <32f6a2ce-e30f-059f-dcd4-233d666a10a1@yandex.ru> <87tuzqmskt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a71hv584.fsf@logand.com> <87k10jerlv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <60515aaa-0d1e-598a-985d-850265c664ae@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="127004"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Steinar Bang , Richard Stallman , Arthur Miller , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov , Juri Linkov , Tomas Hlavaty Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 07 17:33:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jhxIw-000WvL-4d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 17:33:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhxIv-0004kS-7o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 11:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhxIB-0004KV-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 11:32:59 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:42352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhxI9-0000FP-RU; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 11:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 057FNJiT074740; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:32:39 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=HG1xnVIo9khX3zQp+MtiseR6l6xmFj6VHrbto25YOgo=; b=wowqCV38g2/0/lQfpXcYPbkUWq2QfiWu9bgNdaIESPVTi4CzARSJboojYh09hEgrKYDC Yd+3C99sZIjdCkyJCB9NsO/A6oYg2Nzrqs1nQc7W+CZtLqAHJGtQbw+U3YyBxZkhY6x5 ubMzED2yR+AqcLYgbBaE78uzc81gRd2Il6YWPTcOxzEOAekjdX2emPL/0d89rsUUuGKb UgMg6/6DMYdEIXISaw5GK6SVS2ULnMbV9leMZtjO3VC33cCiGq+u3AisxcMf09fRG0aO q27yqQcyZfhnzdoUSr2pjnkKi5iKRWk1Yi9p8Uf5YQmaom3GrjpsFdA6Bpowm1r0o9P2 Uw== Original-Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 31g2jqukqj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:32:38 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 057FODC0049812; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:32:38 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 31gn1ydj5u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:32:37 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 057FWXki010805; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:32:33 GMT In-Reply-To: <60515aaa-0d1e-598a-985d-850265c664ae@yandex.ru> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5005.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9645 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006070118 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9645 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006070118 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.86; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2130.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/07 11:32:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252014 Archived-At: > > BTW, why browse-url.el still doesn't support the Brave web browser? > > Brave solved the problem of malware. It's one of the most secure > > and privacy-respecting web browsers. >=20 > Not so sure about that: >=20 > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3D234420= 27__;! > !GqivPVa7Brio!PGyydJ9-LLd8XIznjSJYn6c7uA9nqpwscDwdwqEeZPfto_aWii9FMcJ- > c7L01E0p$ Thanks for that link. Interesting discussion. I'm no expert on these things, but this remark there seems relevant: "Brave ads are opt-in, for people who would like to earn "shitty" cryptocurrency by clicking on them." I opted out, at the outset. Perhaps I'm not aware of some other behind-the-scenes behavior that's problematic. I didn't read all of the page you link to in detail, but my (maybe naive) impression is that if you opt out of ads that pretty much takes care of things. The only technical problem I've encountered with Brave, compared to Google Chrome, is that some dropdown/pulldown lists on some sites don't work.