Re: TaskPaper and Org-Mode?

["Clint Laskowski" <clint.laskowski@gmail.com>]

I think simplicity would be the biggest advantage. I started with
Org-Mode about six months ago and I think I've noticed an increase in
the complexity (that's probably also partly due to reading threads on
this list which, arguably, is a portal into the most complex aspects
of Org-Mode).

I need to re-think/re-consider my suggestion and articulate it more
clearly, I think!

-- Clint

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Sven Bretfeld <sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>  "Egli Christian (KIRO 433)" <christian.egli@credit-suisse.com> writes:
>
>  >> TaskPaper seems to be a really simple way of documenting tasks in text
>  >> with a GTD style. Here's an example:
>  >
>  >> I think it would be extremely useful to incorporate TaskPaper into
>  >> Org-Mode.
>  >
>  >From what I can tell Taskpaper seems to be a subset of org-mode. How
>  > would an integration  of TaskPaper look like? What features does
>  > TaskPaper have that org-mode doesn't have?
>
>  I just read through the web-description and had a short look at the
>  code of tastpaper.el. And the very same question appears to me.
>
>  The only thing I can imagine why one should prefer taskpaper.el over
>  org is its simplicity. org-mode has grown quite complex in the last
>  few months. That's an advantage, of course, but might prevent new
>  users from giving it a try. However, an integration of both modes
>  would rise the complexity.
>
>  I may be wrong. Which advantage do you see, Clint?
>
>  Greetings
>
>  Sven
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>  Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>  Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>  http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>



-- 

-- Clint

Clint Laskowski, CISSP
clint.laskowski@gmail.com