From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: oauth2 support for Emacs email clients Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:40:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <52589.36892.953561.24840@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34543"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Roland Winkler , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 03 22:41:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mB1E4-0008eg-62 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 22:41:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48516 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mB1E2-0003TF-MZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 16:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mB1DU-0002mv-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 16:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:38308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mB1DS-00086s-Vn; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 16:40:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1628023243; bh=d3T7FEUoRun5zpgQIlMnyiyU8MQUKlaGTiA8ZFtLJn8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=W4hXoCOrVO/M2LeI7nRs9LVfTmMQu/H+29wZlrQhHHo84QhPjyus2OgqkVHkDZS26 ZUbg1Tb3lFGMs5vKIxdG0RfY8KVbwQ/8Klka2S0OsFbnYHUaIKsQlWYkwUupVPNgal 3Ege7+n13UD+eCKXG6GRENJF9vA+Obr7+7aM5vSZeAR5Hj/oeyCZk+0GkJNXwk+e0K 55OAL9xW1rkit1G2qnDZxh9HDG38Q7CYjgjluZUJ1NHuj3q3hSe3JI4LB2BWdH5291 FZmN2iOE0ByCm90RqTqY8oJk7cFVKyIu3ljo9Y/Oq2eiiIebw003d9n1M0M73YICtD CG7j3Pyg370uw== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272000 Archived-At: >> Someone might agree to take the legal risk to violate these TOS. >> IANAL, but I observe that no other "small" free software project (e.g. >> Mutt or Alpine) took that risk. Two larger free software projects >> (Thunderbird and Kmail) took that risk, but their apps were registered >> by a legal person, not by a developer. > > There you have something, isn't FSF a legal person? Is GNU an > organisation right? > It is indeed. If the lawyers of the FSF agree to do that, I would (of course) have no objection.