From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 10:39:34 -0700 Message-ID: References: <8A8DA980-13A7-4F8B-9D07-391728C673C9@raeburn.org> <83a8889ede.fsf@gnu.org> <144D5F87-D876-485D-BAB3-2AA93627272A@raeburn.org> <83inmq53xk.fsf@gnu.org> <96D35768-314C-43F5-BD5E-B12187759DCA@raeburn.org> <123104DD-447F-4CDB-B3A0-CED80E3AC8C9@raeburn.org> <20170403165736.GA2851@acm> <2497A2D5-FDB1-47FF-AED3-FD4ABE2FE144@raeburn.org> <83lgrhpalq.fsf@gnu.org> <0D99B4FE-FEEF-4565-87D6-E230A05DEF3C@raeburn.org> <86lgrc4vob.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <834ly0oew1.fsf@gnu.org> <968E8F50-92F6-43C7-B7E4-EE8378943087@raeburn.org> <83wpawmj4d.fsf@gnu.org> <1e397033-8291-1625-8b78-a1e1c200aea5@gmail.com> <18196f08-408d-8b17-423e-8be54507bb84@gmail.com> <8360hkkcgj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495129250 11207 195.159.176.226 (18 May 2017 17:40:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:40:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 18 19:40:46 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBPPp-0002oa-Sx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 19:40:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBPPv-0003RF-Fw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:40:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBPOz-0003Ok-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBPOv-0003la-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:56366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBPOu-0003jV-TZ; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:39:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=enQoWTXTu1bvYPSMf5y0VTjhYRe37dodgBReE/HuOlk=; b=DT4bzF5j6csa5qHBxwAmbxuGIA6qUVohJFCx0HkD9IsfAtTABaS5Gpk5g2tNg5Iqbtom4yI0weu7utyxDxF8ZmgeAYN5pvIUTxInuyr2W4LX2C9Defd349xCcAPSe5K/fzA2arSgoAErp0K2vyyo0hkn0WAuOqLcV4lhhaVCqJG7dSnfdXQU3/OaTVml3OsNzpYEZh26ijRWQF/3CZ0lzXDWgGTyLEm2KKk5vg7tTMj//K9TT6A2jp00LP/aNAUJ8cLPoDQkn527nkaZc+pFC36cIAl2nnZVEYDa3Le+VUjL+/85EkdEHA5AhwzgVV8Oo0HrZ6SZzc96DOX1Ipzg7g==; Original-Received: from c-73-140-245-253.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([73.140.245.253] helo=[192.168.1.173]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBPOl-00071J-Q7; Thu, 18 May 2017 10:39:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8360hkkcgj.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 96.126.100.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214951 Archived-At: On 05/01/2017 05:07 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Philipp Stephani >> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:40:46 +0000 >> >> All I'm suggesting is that the impact of such changes should be >> measured, and that startup time in batch mode isn't everything. > > Startup time in batch mode isn't everything, but if it's a frequent > use case in which even relatively short delays are tangible, we should > try to find a way of minimizing those delays. I'm in a position to rebase my portable dumper patch. The last few months have been, er, interesting.