all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Ponce via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 72689@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#72689: 31.0.50; Proposal to improve string-pixel-width
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 09:36:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddda4d91-9326-45a8-8df2-42fb536b2050@orange.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbcd9da5-0d5b-b012-51da-187d0a4ff064@gmail.com>

On 18/08/2024 8:12 AM, Jim Porter wrote:
> On 8/17/2024 3:03 PM, David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors wrote:
>> I propose the attached patch to make string-pixel-width faster while
>> using less memory, as shown by the following results of a basic
>> benchmark run in emacs -Q to compare the current implementation and this
>> proposal:[snip]
> 
>> -      (insert (propertize string 'line-prefix nil 'wrap-prefix nil))
>> +      (insert string)
>> +      ;; Prefer `remove-text-properties' to `propertize' to avoid
>> +      ;; creating a new string on each call.
>> +      (remove-text-properties
>> +       (point-min) (point-max) '(line-prefix nil wrap-prefix nil))
> 
> Is this change safe? I suppose most of the time, this wouldn't matter, but I could imagine a case where a caller wanted the pixel-width of a string that had one of those properties set, and they'd want those properties to be preserved (e.g. if the string was to be inserted into a buffer later).
> 
> Maybe this code could just check for the presence of 'line-prefix' or 'wrap-prefix' properties and only call 'propertize' if they're in the string? (Or maybe it's even possible to leave the string as-is and compute the width in some way that accounts for these properties in the correct way...)
> 
> I'm not sure how much this matters, but I always get a bit nervous about a function changing something about one of its arguments when it's not obvious.

My implementation proposal does not change the behavior of the
function. It is just an attempt to improve its performance.

As far as I am concerned I do not think that the values ​​of
line-prefix, wrap prefix and display-line-numbers should be taken into
account because the number of pixels of a string should not depend
on the position where this string is displayed, but only on its own
display attributes like faces and other display properties.





  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-18  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-17 22:03 bug#72689: 31.0.50; Proposal to improve string-pixel-width David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-18  4:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-18  6:05   ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-18  9:15     ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-19  8:49       ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-20 15:12       ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-21 13:17         ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-21 20:43           ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-22  3:43             ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-22  9:48               ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-22 10:59                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-22 14:56                   ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-23  6:20                     ` Juri Linkov
2024-08-23  6:49                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-23  7:23                         ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-31  8:26                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-31 10:51                       ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-31 12:00                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-08-18  6:12 ` Jim Porter
2024-08-18  7:36   ` David Ponce via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2024-08-18 16:35     ` Jim Porter
2024-08-18  9:23   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ddda4d91-9326-45a8-8df2-42fb536b2050@orange.fr \
    --to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=72689@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=da_vid@orange.fr \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=jporterbugs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.