From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:26:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <87d07xamrg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83blmu9u57.fsf@gnu.org> <7c61a272-f4ba-fdfd-755b-1a720e8cc2df@gmail.com> <838shy9srs.fsf@gnu.org> <7f820b59-ebbc-18c7-9f08-104a7ba88dd2@gmail.com> <834kslao2y.fsf@gnu.org> <052569f9-0571-6471-7a27-f3d7b36497a0@gmail.com> <83sgg58ari.fsf@gnu.org> <837dxh847w.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="30740"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ndame@protonmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 12 19:27:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYYga-0007lt-9e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 19:27:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYYgZ-0001aS-Aj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:27:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYYfy-00012k-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:26:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]:38630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYYfx-0002oO-0v; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:26:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id f189so8781197qkd.5; Tue, 12 May 2020 10:26:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zP0Dl0ALbDRcp9vUjvIEKrl3zYd4N+ksU6U8HKQDcFg=; b=rKwcS1jBrU0jU8nTBnzeMiAKk6OLIGXWtpzYEwkYM+M18c9tbhvx4U1EM8zuRh/z9B sM0gbn7NCwd1oKHr8KGMS/nysIHe9mWoG5BhqwTIagAyQhhDpT0uCMCA3kKb8tR9aU2+ PwhYcc6EJcVjBKRpuX1rk1BFAIcN/XjhxCUNNnVNdXyw6WSujC/ToIxVQ4CQ9i7tu22C qActDZYFy8vz1HkqwTKvGpCJsBFL8ZZXhxvt4/tNR/8RgyA/DaUBXP0Nl47MjEahDv/x sjcGFvmlCY6Rh/E7Khidxbqyb9E9rypUfUcS0mv15u1hw8Yb2SOiOZVlu3H5L5hK8/w6 mH6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zP0Dl0ALbDRcp9vUjvIEKrl3zYd4N+ksU6U8HKQDcFg=; b=ILptDEtqiG3bOU3MVgmNB4MpWUduUBfVmA41Ks1ogeHbTAFvSj3Kq/MHEfpLj0dQv8 ZB4sXFE3tbdmJ0vn6eRNye07V50N6A+r9cv6Q49D0eLUsLByLox941rVVIHa+5oWki/l e6n8XTO7ywZQmhkegxdiJAjHWoqJXBELlUHUhi+RcLQcFeSAHxIbKWNGDPYH8BSvauwl 4ppzQGDdGhv8YVjGIvE1lgX+tKkiEfM6zYHxkWw4GtwHZ9qdIR58vAPeBlYRrPRenZ3m om56EC1cqrbjdi3eLau+a0EJEhMIQFQoG9a+WP8dYeG97gco+nyPQaWFzEs52I7DAheh LAxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iM4BJqg4lBP/mbvqt0wqQknUtgckQJzHTwqctfpmfPmIo5pzv b4c/dRPlKgytXH4n0DR0AIc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznXLGlQ4FYDa6E7KVaLseqJ2aCIwOcb2DBu3tdLl3fu2nGZPMa+6t501/JgG3NAtuS3PcE3w== X-Received: by 2002:a37:6547:: with SMTP id z68mr8832325qkb.197.1589304399407; Tue, 12 May 2020 10:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:184:4180:66e7:4d17:b25e:8d9:2188? ([2601:184:4180:66e7:4d17:b25e:8d9:2188]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h185sm11537561qkc.19.2020.05.12.10.26.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 May 2020 10:26:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837dxh847w.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d; envelope-from=cpitclaudel@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x72d.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250001 Archived-At: On 12/05/2020 13.15, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: rms@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, >> casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >> ndame@protonmail.com >> From: Clément Pit-Claudel >> Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 12:44:40 -0400 >> >> On 12/05/2020 10.53, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> I think there was an agreement that providing a public API for >>> checking this would be good. But "Someone" needs to do that, and even >>> after that not every situation could be resolved mechanically, >>> certainly not at "git commit" time. A human should be in the loop. >> >> My proposal is that this API should be the FSF signing public keys > > I don't think I follow. FSF is not a piece of software and not an > API. It is an organization. How can an organization be an API? With the scheme I propose, you don't need an API any more, I think (for properly signed commits). You still have the same problem for old commits, of course.