From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C and Emacs Lisp code parts Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 20:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <624c3d37-c829-7187-a699-7d7bbc211a20@online.de> <83ziq1u668.fsf@gnu.org> <83y45lu2up.fsf@gnu.org> <54f5d80c-f20b-31aa-b438-401984fcb5b8@online.de> <874m89crw3.fsf@red-bean.com> <58c6fa18-d636-1498-8d37-b435c4ee8ec9@online.de> <83r3bdth7f.fsf@gnu.org> <06dfdf82-c469-8abe-15ab-22a96e64070b@online.de> <20160701175515.GA2618@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467397627 5877 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2016 18:27:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 18:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 20:26:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bJ39M-00026y-HN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 20:26:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35147 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJ39I-00011U-EI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJ39C-0000p1-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:26:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJ397-0002M7-0X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:50998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJ396-0002Lw-Mf; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:26:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([95.119.235.231]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbrjI-1biAhG2G1s-00jIrl; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 20:26:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160701175515.GA2618@acm.fritz.box> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:N+tI4JEVp7Dh42dGuTb0Z3jOsYEwZc2ndpaosGZ6I+jD9XjUupR srBKTahNjuaRG/386b/UW36FzPSNKrQ1cYtv1b9wGOjChm0FzIgff2JGgpDVrrrFfPYqqvl vqLfAfkPRCi0m59xEITTJ8hN7u8K+7sptt1bKh5DeucuXxxAhP5L86a53Lice2LgAWXpT6o vLhkD6WdHKn7BUL2VhsqQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:z4J9qlIbA8E=:Ax1cztoekU6gJw0yB05CDF 8JxG/0DQ/tOnf/roNjewe2YrWCMA/T13QlfzHQ1cOun6Y5vqflKFCaRam0k8OUmLfsEeuZH7J qPBiS/SfCoZqQRTXSaVfplc0WSbp4H6PamYkiOgAKC0CDXQVy0/5As+m1REzkoTjOlwVvKI0r JREV9ipL8X7ttFs/JGVYYa4wUTE4V+uwxJMxcFc2hQcpAAzyvKziKvpNgH4qyI0Litt2V+Tk3 ZGBqk5CKipiCbm/JDC2Nfxhyp2PbwvvfBxndtIh9nwAA77d8n5Xt5brXojnkbBx3gmDnhjcPs LvRF5TJWIYc7yO0XOF6iSVU4zWnHQedLQ/Zjb7iKReTeFfvLwIkaaKW98J2PZXm4WU2PbMqR/ 1NED6CrGkSE8FJMoROlZiGu0X7cEFkTObgEL/ShlwBD65+SESVAjZqmWy+xARdrpHJhJ4HtTC tBdvLeDpNbs02zFQhS0V0JbgNXusOinhaUm6cejtLxq3uKILLAuTCj9a+6Qf+E2fmawpc3Ak0 vve31vd3E36lhdUQLMvyS2S9KyVMW/ZFojMUBwgy9j+krFKg0m0zhBYYUVJhNomLQJ9/SW50Z /oAFXkbQrd2vkNEGTsd8Wg+1AYZ/71chdAzH9izii5/07ZAEBwTvZSVuDjcxB0a83V60RjaJA 8HH5+DzzyjHMBcarEy4f1TzB3Ue/LzdOe5h2+gzC1YyBivwBR0giRGgzAZnhDO44AiHfkM8xV fnn7PAdCrivnYxDt X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.74 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205048 Archived-At: On 01.07.2016 19:55, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Andreas. > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 07:36:23PM +0200, Andreas Röhler wrote: > > > > My own feeling is that font-lock.el works fast enough That was only an example for displayed-related stuff in Emacs Lisp. If there is no problem with font-lock and updating buffers after change etc., the better. So my impression, a remarkable amount of reports deal with slowness of display/re-display were wrong.