From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9669: 24.0.50; `tramp-compat.el' in *Help* when it doesn't belong (?) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:32:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <9FAA3F1BBBDA459E9BAA10031D31F161@us.oracle.com> <494CCB7AC74E4D1EA5E29B76ED77CEE7@us.oracle.com> <22AF24DE217344A19DDE7B62F90BAA43@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360831234 29775 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2013 08:40:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:40:34 +0000 (UTC) To: 9669-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 14 09:40:56 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uND-0001E2-SR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:40:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36066 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uMp-0000MA-Tt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:40:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uMj-0000Lq-95 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:40:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uFz-0002C3-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uFz-0002Bz-IH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:33:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uGY-0007mA-Uj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:34:03 -0500 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 9669 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Mail-Followup-To: 9669@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 9669-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D9669.136083080629812 (code D ref 9669); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9669-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2013 08:33:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uFw-0007kk-IL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:33:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uFu-0007kb-5b for 9669-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:33:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5uFJ-0005iS-H3; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:32:45 -0500 X-Spook: Iran Mantis tempest Saddam Hussein security bce Kh-11 BRLO X-Ran: =MFyDz#qXa{!>.i]N6.,?r[N (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:45:42 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71256 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> 2. I compile the files using Emacs 20, not Emacs 24. >> Maybe #2 is the root of the problem? > > I'd say you found your problem, indeed.