From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18725: [PATCH]: Emacs 24.4. Say "no" to "erase customizations?". .emacs gets written. Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:52:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413388399 18422 80.91.229.3 (15 Oct 2014 15:53:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , 18725@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 15 17:53:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQsy-000809-8P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:53:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45408 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQsx-0007LR-UH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQss-0007IS-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQso-0002tJ-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQso-0002tD-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQso-0007JF-62 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18725 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18725-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18725.141338834128038 (code B ref 18725); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18725) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2014 15:52:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQs9-0007I9-BP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:52:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQs7-0007I1-DY for 18725@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:52:20 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQs6-0004t0-8p; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:52:18 -0400 X-Spook: Watergate security Ruby Ridge Audiotel Noriega AMW MDA X-Ran: )1e6c! (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:39:48 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94542 Stefan Monnier wrote: > [ How did you end up with gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org in the "To:" > field? ] http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16155#51 > Otherwise, looks good, please install, Did you mean into emacs-24, because AFAIK this is not a new issue and is only a minor thing. Are we sure this is safe?