From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:23:13 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463595874 15493 80.91.229.3 (18 May 2016 18:24:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 18:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Artur Malabarba To: Paul Eggert , Mark Oteiza Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 18 20:24:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b368l-0002sN-1M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 20:24:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46497 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b368k-0005Ny-96 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:24:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b368c-0005Mi-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b368Z-0003p7-BS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b368Z-0003p1-7Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b368Z-00070N-37 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:24:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 18:24:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22440 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 22440-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22440.146359580526853 (code B ref 22440); Wed, 18 May 2016 18:24:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 18:23:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b367w-0006z3-U4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:23:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:35187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b367v-0006yn-0N for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:23:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id r12so47322869wme.0 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:23:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vh9tdKVmgfC7Kv6z+NJqRRQ71btcrKAsVvx55yd3LcA=; b=ME5Pa0RjTVbN0ULFTqVutyAvZQl52apCDqrOj4UAiglcTu7oKfGsfUUJhBm3la2TPL ItHYHCHtZYHw1Q7DPpRDSu6bljalhTPP9vEmZyQ6XafelHzme94QkoPotGZLtL4GZEWv 8xo5tXkQT/aIddoG2EtLk169MCUsMDOUauMJ7PoQEgdfPToRUK5OUlMUrVWBxEjkni4n pri55o1x5TSJ5enDEfKQkE5RkmP3N6KH/7LEPQxv3Qvl3cdLBg182k3t5qNhVTztWVaa AXYi3ywHC8gVGB/nzgifco8iPp9ekcn/q7lcJeukrq8O/FBXfFT0RVJInIxeKt4WbTLr cOFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vh9tdKVmgfC7Kv6z+NJqRRQ71btcrKAsVvx55yd3LcA=; b=ZssOBZB4LcpZfBO2mwNgTww6hDJQ9HKRCBROQRPPs+O3BIjO+KxemaWKbZctMbs8tK B+I9TBvwOj3bR7heyiBC3ZYZ6l9roThOrldtFYOX3Xe1JS0eldiLJDmgEcTlKGyAKTSx rwZb9vUdbqDvCWaeQM358iHQVVE3jMpviPp7YxfN/cAcBhbWGgS+dVtXaGRkl9wJBcfG 2Sefo/B7viTMXnKNfajVmzt+GZCM2imIQUSAXBTRQoWz3o1VaKRnrkni31nAkQm9qdDx I8O6tvDq4jiRlMx0X2eZHqXZG2KMYWBNo7Lr9cNrq7mk7V8z4kSXXichbpD06kqB3DjL p28Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUmO98bZm4AkxTryufcUBMo492VrGafWb4Z/cUrVO/Df9cX120dTy/FoMM7TOisjA== X-Received: by 10.194.47.74 with SMTP id b10mr6097268wjn.4.1463595797314; Wed, 18 May 2016 11:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t3sm15063065wmf.20.2016.05.18.11.23.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 May 2016 11:23:16 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118406 Archived-At: On 05/18/2016 09:10 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > I observed the same thing, but as I have no idea how packages ought to > work I didn't know whether that was expected. If not, it's a bug too -- > should it get a different bug report or is this all the same bug? These are related, but orthogonal issues. The newfound bug is that package-refresh-contents for some reason expects that package-check-signature could have only been modified via Custom.