From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maxim Nikulin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12972: [PATCH] Avoid regression in mailcap-view-file similar to Bug#44824 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 23:24:23 +0700 Message-ID: References: <87r1hmdqek.fsf__16088.3597027109$1622530682$gmane$org@gnus.org> <835yxtlw14.fsf__2546.8955327355$1625164803$gmane$org@gnu.org> <1ddf1c46-0a28-4a2d-cc40-094ff74ee0ac@gmail.com> <837di8ki24.fsf__46278.4886871063$1625229533$gmane$org@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18683"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 To: 12972@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 02 18:25:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lzLyi-0004lM-Ja for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 18:25:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lzLyh-0004To-Ba for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:25:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lzLyR-0004Ta-A5; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lzLyR-0002l5-2Z; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzLyQ-00071b-DB; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Maxim Nikulin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12972 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 12972-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12972.162524307526960 (code B ref 12972); Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12972) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 16:24:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzLxz-00070l-JU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:24:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:33574) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzLxw-00070W-GU for 12972@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id t17so19169757lfq.0 for <12972@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:24:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5QstJtowVMjBE2QcVtLlzKt6leJX9Z4X70k+nynvwpU=; b=dacLG6ncT+qlWz3YCuXdnuWvX07pQyoaq8oC3FNF6hM2E6zom8Qw4nQMCHlmdv/Czs 9lQJlWPdC5iwUoiomlFsraNC4Jvy3RCMCp+I2viF4vPkLYvuxHrQMY36wUoigFwxzKsf C7N8XnbWwPH6NX/ypXVdW5bge1MXkMzHefPF/PptMJ/5mZRpKehstH2tp76KYqqUId1t aCFkmUcOJPI45+L4+mxw5a8ivya4Wj2SFEw2lLx/Vq6l0PwmoUsLlOZdS3O0J4FZ2qlR Zr1YwlnbU1d9IpyoW523dP+xBKeDC3Voc9rL17bbOi7/6qpEEjku4orQlvGNwEqLUXmR Iaxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5QstJtowVMjBE2QcVtLlzKt6leJX9Z4X70k+nynvwpU=; b=uV49luaHQeNvXoOtbT/ffrb9HR8kYIsKC3oeYy6arbJP56U6rB4AI8ocHgqFvpKsu5 l8t2CiREkrtzJOLyIaXUFzHmWKY6R2shDXAdlGPa9wvz06XwTEyODsuiM4HjUYArOUqM vcFTUq4rLw38tcznWXcpEjRBdaY338+CR420vQl88q/y8XxYvaq4C0anAU8GZk5mFCK6 bTsnU38Q32K6qu+GHbfcZ/S83imE0IDmRE0GQYi6TJi2fguiX7/4Zg+KtPqKRdan44jE 3RHfCo0dRUi0pKj+R1FKy5u2YvozKXGgYvFG9tDJBpf9UCf22ThtpTqr+wqI3wxSWXWd HwBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KLffM8nCYhSXknfBkqP489HW/5KM6JXdX4ej2wB9Vm1SFDv9i E8EiByErSeSifv0rfGUDpPbZq4k4z8s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfUCFBw6jhKlNTJwjzdYijv560M3jlZ09kNTjPCQc+ksQDnADrrU7gRXlqiwwm1vgPvsQmHw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:490d:: with SMTP id w13mr308804lfa.285.1625243066174; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.101] (nat-0-0.nsk.sibset.net. [5.44.169.188]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v16sm401758ljn.93.2021.07.02.09.24.24 for <12972@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:24:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837di8ki24.fsf__46278.4886871063$1625229533$gmane$org@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209330 Archived-At: On 02/07/2021 19:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Maxim Nikulin >> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 19:21:55 +0700 >> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> >>> And with other handlers, this could be an >>> incompatible behavior change if the handler behaves differently when >>> its standard handles are connected to a pipe rather than a terminal >>> device. >> >> Example of such handler, please. > > Why do you need one? Because of I can not imagine such case for mailcap handler in Emacs yet and, accordingly to you, "this could be an incompatible behavior change".