From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Russ P." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: emacs documentation: what's active voice, passive voice? Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <4ca8659e$0$50453$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <322eca01-3bf5-4078-9439-57ba9503afc6@k1g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <877hhz6p8n.fsf@gmail.com> <87sk0natmu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291953653 2104 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2010 04:00:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:00:53 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 10 05:00:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQuA3-0005Yn-MD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:00:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56148 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQtkQ-00015F-UP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:34:18 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!h37g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 17 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.220.46.82 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1286146629 12037 127.0.0.1 (3 Oct 2010 22:57:09 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: h37g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.220.46.82; posting-account=QXgf4wkAAADkKLOneY6DWJPpPelAjS0c User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100915 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.10,gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:181624 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:23:33 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:77303 Archived-At: On Oct 3, 1:50=A0pm, David Kastrup wrote: > Jay Belanger writes: > >> Then I would have to write "I varied the parameters and ran the test > >> again." That just doesn't strike me as good style for a technical > >> paper. > > > Why not? > > The next test run used a different set of parameters. Maybe, but I'm not sure. It seems to me that you've anthropomorphisized the test run. The test run does not "use" the parameters. The experimenter does. You could say, "The next test run had a different set of parameters." But then you're back to passive voice, or so it seems to me -- but what do I know?