From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding refactoring capabilities to Emacs Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 20:20:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83fs4f36wi.fsf@gnu.org> <1b963d24-51b3-8128-ad14-e4af2c9f0c43@gutov.dev> <8408fa63-af93-ab36-8524-fa12de7918ea@gutov.dev> <4c69224e-0500-9881-6a1f-7c36f1226123@gutov.dev> <83jzs91neo.fsf@gnu.org> <75a51f1a-b621-807f-8fbb-0cfcad785c04@gutov.dev> <837co9ypih.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6405"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: ams@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 29 19:21:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qmHB6-0001Fp-KG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 19:21:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmHAm-0002NX-JV; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmHAj-0002Mt-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmHAZ-0004dP-KQ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307875C0003; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:20:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1696008049; x=1696094449; bh=SwcrRrNAdA4ImxXUkIOnmqbJ0tZR3nB2xQy vmvfytg8=; b=FkXJ2fIf/UrZtotQwCy0AYIsxrGwOZXj2FK+OmpVBh9p7GGq6Ey aDXTIgsPq4XFqnujBbWqY7zi4vWe3KcUov13TpRJkhKiZAAQKt1d58/vkoYAqQ8r PgyixssFWl5JXcJ+aCHiO5CDlmbGu+4P7pDzkRdPuZfFb+w80bemno2E2UWXXfCU dkM5Ctei+UuQNWzHyfV9OQiMLioSOC92ujSnrmph9U9UxWzXQLKIRRcO/HsFS3dJ nPhQoMvk7HDs1VVdPS2Y2j0cjV+MT4XTvLu48mrJtVDfthVz832sUS5J8/zWTGIM 2z4jKT2fcVb0PzMUlr1j/UK2VCTACoXwpkQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1696008049; x=1696094449; bh=SwcrRrNAdA4ImxXUkIOnmqbJ0tZR3nB2xQy vmvfytg8=; b=nubd4pxM6iN7Qfwmt3phkT3yEp5V9zxUvWJdLb2QEk4NXuDlN/+ WylZ0au/pLRrRMDAPYtdcFwk30QOfmwX2pCvdzaWQ0oG8TBN2EpliCkeFU+K66D7 FIcFHtPUx9xgn89CTJy5JoMFuylQ1RITJIvwepTMi3ZIXe86lc3J21+vPe1p6eXK A4Jdb0JTZ94Fs2ExBEEYUxhg5PoNHS3fpLZeVAUYcYEz+z7kdwAI/1kbuYiML+N7 poriptLliS4TzWh2EX+xHFzI7k/9eoaf+KIrRl+/mLUOx4Od6phs/vnLMlIvW5aj 2hvoAZCMdpJMy0H4dYij70D5S+wv1UzaDig== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrtddvgdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepiefgteevheevveffheeltdeukeeiieekueefgedugfefgefhudelgfefveel vdevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:20:47 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <837co9ypih.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.295, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:311179 Archived-At: On 29/09/2023 18:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:21:43 +0300 >> Cc: ams@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >> philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> >>>> Correction: C-x v v. >>> That functionality of "C-x v v" is only available for Git (and >>> basically is undocumented), so it's too early to declare victory. >> >> It's available for Git, for Hg (two separate dedicated implementations), >> and for the other VCSes too on best-effort basis (see the function >> vc-default-checkin-patch). > > Yes, I found this out by now, thanks. Which makes it even worse that > no documentation of "C-x v v" mentions that, anywhere! (And many > things that "C-x v v" did for years aren't documented, either, sigh.) > > We should do better than that. We should. But the problem started at the "no feedback" step. When there is no interest even among the greybeards on this list, why spend extra effort advertising something untested?