From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Elena Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: c/c++ project management and debugging Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:19:07 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <4D0F4058.6050101@gmail.com> <038dfa58-3e80-4c49-bbd0-c1bbb16c41f1@j25g2000vbs.googlegroups.com> <0d3b97e2-c21c-4a83-a8dc-1ba186a5a405@m11g2000vbs.googlegroups.com> <87k4j2x0n3.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293007250 24282 80.91.229.12 (22 Dec 2010 08:40:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:40:50 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 22 09:40:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PVKFW-0007Bc-0D for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:40:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PVKFV-0007lF-FO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:40:41 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!v23g2000vbi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 21 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.96.190.244 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1293005948 18659 127.0.0.1 (22 Dec 2010 08:19:08 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v23g2000vbi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.96.190.244; posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:183528 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:77771 Archived-At: On Dec 21, 9:43=A0pm, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" wrote: > Elena writes: > > That's the problem: every Emacs power user seems to be chasing this > > holy grail of a greatly customized Emacs, but I have yet to see a > > customized Emacs matching a customized IDE. > > IDE are not customizable. > > Providing a non generic customization language (as some IDE I had to > suffer) doesn't count. > > -- > __Pascal Bourguignon__ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.= informatimago.com/ > A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. Is Emacs Lisp more generic than - let's say - VBScript or Javascript? Or than writing plugins. Even if I admit that writing plugins is cumbersome and Lisp is the one true extension language, I don't think so.