From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 21 and w3 on Debian Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:52:42 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87sm0fbjx4.fsf@tiger.rapttech.com.au> <874qcvqar0.fsf@spamfoil.invalid> <87oeb2c2x5.fsf@tiger.rapttech.com.au> <87fywebcp7.fsf@tiger.rapttech.com.au> <87ll66pavk.fsf@spamfoil.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117044358 18685 80.91.229.2 (25 May 2005 18:05:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 18:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 25 20:05:57 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Db0EG-0000gb-2T for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 20:03:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Db0IA-0006Vo-DY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Db0Ej-0004lQ-IQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Db0Eb-0004f7-1i for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Db0Ea-0004R4-3i for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:04:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Db072-0003GO-Iq for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 13:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Db04E-0007dv-JM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 19:53:18 +0200 Original-Received: from 207.167.42.60 ([207.167.42.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 19:53:18 +0200 Original-Received: from ihs_4664 by 207.167.42.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 19:53:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.167.42.60 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:26981 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:26981 Klaus Straubinger wrote: > Wouldn't it be more correct to replace the first argument of > url-callback-arguments with the redirect-uri if there are any > such callback arguments present? I have experienced problems > with your solution that went away with this improvement. How exactly is that improvement implemented? (cons redirect-uri url-callback-arguments) (if url-callback-arguments (cons redirect-uri (cdr url-callback-arguments)) (list redirect-uri)) -- Kevin Rodgers