From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: handling many matches Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 12:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <<<119c0543-387d-4fad-b7fe-b4e07a7be4f8@default>>> <<>> <<<837dxuvohj.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<>> <<<83wo5usaui.fsf@gnu.org>>> <> <<83o8r6qj8a.fsf@gnu.org>> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="69482"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov@yandex.ru, adam@alphapapa.net, kyle@kyleam.com, drew.adams@oracle.com To: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 21:19:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxfP-000Hyk-Q1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 21:19:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxfO-00060Q-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:19:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxed-00058D-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:18:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxec-0006jT-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:34448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxea-0006ho-OG; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 042JHes2168303; Sat, 2 May 2020 19:18:17 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=VEjmDi0xBDBIRceTeZnFTyK7TfkV1mQd5RuxpAeAWPo=; b=o/ANxQsqzr/AHks1HQspg6EC34jQJgV9fYqZOZJ5WdwsEYF/1baohUVhJhmch108N1Me iJcVYTAUuI15N/hW1FSdw/ov+tDnPNfvz0A9+/ya/lrrlN24/iyuYIUw7qdU3dG/B0V/ RaoVbJHsXjGOevbKmyxlB4IuXE8EidaeS41IEAj8q0YBF0t4EMmNQGqw+C0RPZMXigQv jEqByV8IwOyIPUYQuiVb6Tu5mOyh9yDVW5NipsOztbNTpe7GKBtSqyvLi6jcsmTroCiY a9eoSXkwFCcux3NxPeCor5H0JsaySN7CJgwizIop8f8s1iicdmakADp72BC6fuzSopPZ sg== Original-Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30s1gmsj8c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 02 May 2020 19:18:17 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 042JH7QX158467; Sat, 2 May 2020 19:18:17 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30s913phu9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 02 May 2020 19:18:16 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 042JIDJp026130; Sat, 2 May 2020 19:18:14 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83o8r6qj8a.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4993.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9609 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=18 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005020168 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9609 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=18 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005020168 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 13:11:05 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.85 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248549 Archived-At: > > Relatively little of that power/accuracy comes > > from it learning from your habits (your previous > > searches etc.). It mostly comes from back links, > > i.e., how many links a URL has from other URLs. >=20 > AFAIK, this is outdated. It's how search engines > worked several years ago. They are much smarter nowadays. "Relatively" is the key word there. And "mostly". > > Of course, links among web pages in turn reflect > > user use patterns (including searches). But not > > just your own use patterns. >=20 > I have evidence that my personal details and previous searches do > affect the results. Did you read where I acknowledged that? Clearly the search engine's knowledge of you, your location, your search history, your browser history, etc. have a large influence on what hits you get and the order you see them presented. Regardless, your and my searches, in general, will have a lot of hits in common, and so will the order.