From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 00:13:45 +0300 Message-ID: References: <0c88192c-3c33-46ed-95cb-b4c6928016e3@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="100670"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: Richard Stallman , Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , =?UTF-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= , Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , Philippe Vaucher Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 23:14:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jW4td-000Q5c-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 23:14:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49722 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW4tc-0000D3-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:14:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW4sx-0007XV-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]:36588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW4sw-0003HM-Qc; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id z8so3507943wrw.3; Tue, 05 May 2020 14:13:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RtP9epTAKbPk7ijxEUOH2QlVR0R2GxDD7lgWRg3VsJE=; b=koqEuqK1lLvsebUNaq02Q9b4GmkinI5w0UGyB07tQBVDJPajqzfnAv2RANj6nKWs71 S6grx0nd/H4nFIJoSZho3rfjyHCIFJ0u2DRYs0bnotHAi7y/r+vdgZTvWE1PX2Q6xYMl hs4uGMWuX7OrKVWh1APh3/nJvs7gxljUDA42Q2rKZrhO0wzcRdH8n0d30Rd7Jg0Q9Mc5 6j8ToriAjAj+jzx/Maq7arRhwKx/uU/EJN2fsGPk/HDDvgeiJTt/fT65TTLhwrVgB9z4 uGYK3uiHL3igQAXSNxZm+RtDseTSmDwhy0OqpHxzcZPCcNoDgu6NWe6qEVxaTT55ZvoO luqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RtP9epTAKbPk7ijxEUOH2QlVR0R2GxDD7lgWRg3VsJE=; b=S9MjkRxJJxCrWt3wSKcRPch+VnC5n9FXZizczWSpH8/ND7twKZBMRbzudAbP1xPYWH nsDUq4SJQpe4c6KKUOQnCZKVnVESXOBExv1eZ/H3pF9MK+1NGcDNIXYP6MM/f0puJ0ER 8F9Z1c4WL5dngY8cv5nVHdXRop25BxVvsLkk58GtyamufcrdujjHds435vE7eu/crc6X 0HbpTM+4FZxNCOVVgHrjr2V1B+2OinKMLTqQzB3fuHpL1e34UkFTjHds0BEXcqAhQHlo Zk1qc2DuAh1/3vRtb03q4CSWauwTdKLwnbv99xugC/iTH+mrLaEf6LS3cEv62XUtC4/R /9fA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubQLwhP90ZJRj0+SnPKGdzwJ1vqP22E+vojw0b+gJyqvIUPXycH udm4lwr8Wh4fxO/w2KtYCfose+xm X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLzy9m+bScmuT/Dgj7lZcFdDH5+5D0eqRHcVJeQHzodWt6aBVimVI8ud2jAtCAO3QqQ8uCYFg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f10:: with SMTP id c16mr5341361wru.243.1588713228471; Tue, 05 May 2020 14:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t16sm5462300wmi.27.2020.05.05.14.13.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 May 2020 14:13:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42c; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42c.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249044 Archived-At: On 05.05.2020 23:42, João Távora wrote: > Sure, I think so.  If they were here today, you could have > the s.el library under  the "modern-string" namespace > or "magnar-string" namespace or something like that. I don't > see it'd be contentious. What about the "string" namespace?