From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: LanX Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: fontification problem with PODs Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 07:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <91a903ec-dfbe-4f8c-b607-4253d832e0d1@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <87bpibd4lz.fsf@kzsu.stanford.edu> <32490ecc-3fcd-438c-890e-18f1040d7898@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273017608 12784 80.91.229.12 (5 May 2010 00:00:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 00:00:08 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 02:00:07 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9S1x-0005sP-15 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 02:00:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59027 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O9S1w-0007FZ-J1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 20:00:00 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 12 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.59.65.115 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1272984953 14533 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2010 14:55:53 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 14:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.59.65.115; posting-account=W9fpQwoAAADZYmkl-8sXk1VPxG3rq-Pd User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.0.18) Gecko/2010021502 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.18,gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:177906 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:73313 Archived-At: > Which is a way of saying that the initialisation for cperl-mode isn't > watertight. =A0;-) no it's a way to say that emacs is not watertight. There is no automatic testing system and every little incompatible changes can easily break a complex mode like cperl. I recently had a long discussion until the dev team admitted that they screwed font locking in compilation buffer because they started appending newlines to all regexes ...