From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "S+*n_Pe*rm*n" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags for functions Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:46:01 -0500 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232689914 30708 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2009 05:51:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tzz@lifelogs.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 23 06:53:07 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQEyY-0005ly-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:53:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57032 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQExG-00082I-Gy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:51:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQB7U-0007vS-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:46:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LQB7T-0007vG-Dr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:46:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50657 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LQB7T-0007vD-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.242]:29562) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LQB7S-0008LD-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so5296817rvb.6 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:46:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.11.20 with SMTP id 20mr4140494wfk.62.1232675161285; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:46:01 -0800 (PST) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:51:40 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108136 Archived-At: >Perhaps you should start a >separate thread and make a specific proposal. The standards you have >listed, while very thorough, are not as helpful in such a proposal as a >clear classification proposal that can be seen and touched. I'll bite :) I've created a Mercurial repo with the a proposal as I understand it. You can hg pull and/or download it from: http://sp_dbc@bitbucket.org/sp_dbc/emacs-thesauri-permuted/ Example of Emacs/Elisp thesauri - permuted by hand from .info/.texi files for Emacs and Elisp manuals the `.el' file includes: Top Terms Broader Term ==> Narrower Term relationships This should provide a good pool of keywords even if you only approach the problem from a `tag cloud' perspective. s_P