Well, I was thinking about using it more for tag matches -- like NEXT.
But I am beginning to see how such a feature might make agenda commands
grow in their output and defeat their purpose. For now, I think I can
be more verbose. That little inconvenience is worth all the immense
advantages of org-mode.
d.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Daniel Goldin wrote:I see what you are saying. That has been a minor annoyance for me
> Dear Manish,
>
> Not quite. Although these are very useful enhancements while I'm at the
> computer, I was looking for something that I could publish -- so I could
> carry around a hard copy showing contextual levels.
>
> For example
>
> * Let Jimmy know about annual picnic
> ** NEXT Write letter to Jimmy @COMPUTER
> ** NEXT Send it @ERRAND
>
> If when I look for all todo items matching NEXT, I'll see:
>
> ** Write letter
> ** Send it
>
> Which when I publish doesn't tell me enough. Of course I could become more
> verbose in my sub-level captions, but it would be better to see relevant
> headlines and relevant sub-headlines.
as well. I have been trying to deal with this by being, like you
suggested, more verbose. But I wonder if agenda should show items
that are not scheduled/meant for the day. To test the idea I decided
to write up a small test plan and see what we would want the final
agenda to look like.
,----
| * Plan a weekend outing for [2008-04-26 Sat]
| *** Plan fun stuff
| ***** Hang gliding
| ******* Ask the place to reserve a slot
:@CALL:
| DEADLINE: <2008-04-23 Wed>
| *** Gear to take
| ***** Camera
| ******* Ask Po to return it
:@CALL:
| SCHEDULED: <2008-04-23 Wed>
| *** Guest List
| ***** Invite Jo
:@CALL:
| DEADLINE: <2008-04-24 Thu>
| ***** Invite Mo
:@CALL:
| DEADLINE: <2008-04-25 Fri>
| ***** Invite Bo
:@CALL:
| DEADLINE: <2008-04-23 Wed>
`----
How would you like the agenda to show up on, say, the 24th?
-- Manish