From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Which test files should make-dist distribute? Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:57:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D309E03.7040606@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295035078 22174 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2011 19:57:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 14 20:57:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdpmP-0002PK-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:57:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdpmO-0008Mg-JI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:57:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55760 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdpmE-0008Kf-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:57:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdpmD-0005E8-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:37106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdpmC-0005E4-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47027) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdpm8-0007hp-2o; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:57:32 -0500 X-Spook: advisors benelux security broadside embassy terrorism X-Ran: 4|(Zk.n|-cQ~C){WkVyH_y36:!m1~+u?CsQagsW-0I-/r(zJ<\Z~ X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <4D309E03.7040606@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Fri\, 14 Jan 2011 11\:03\:31 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134542 Archived-At: Paul Eggert wrote: > After recent changes to the trunk added some test files, the > resulting distributions broke "configure", which would complain > that a test Makefile.in was absent from the distribution. So the position has changed? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-10/msg00197.html > why Emacs currently has test/ as a separate top-level directory? Because the test files are not to be distributed with the tarball.