From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature request/RFC: proper highlighting of code embedded in comments Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:21:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <930446db-6dad-72a0-d0cd-a0710e5c6ec3@mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B9aURtr66Q041UIXmLfJa9DMPftLJU9nn" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476566548 4609 195.159.176.226 (15 Oct 2016 21:22:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 21:22:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 15 23:22:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvWP7-0006hJ-7v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:22:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53282 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvWP9-0006NZ-93 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:22:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvWOZ-0006MX-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:21:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvWOU-0006Ou-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:21:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.75]:57643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvWOT-0006Oc-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:21:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([67.186.135.89]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LwptA-1d1ekW14nI-016ONO for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:21:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:T6j7iRUlTVHX1UEnGp2HkrSTf6sUb43kZADcJwfchsK9bRjNePy Dg4VDF3yHcYT7XQjdrnqxgiMXdFq2SJozjJcZJsQUhiv0bVAlYUQO3bGMaCDNQ3nM/0ngOo x0osYmKTmB/SzByUWGZQrUStFXeqg2ELc1cUXwXu89RwH9qTImussMCHYU/HbJ0/Sn+A2or cFgymHV5lMZpfA4kOm/rg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:McBjG17rEsc=:xejyQlzFVOwskzINIT/hrT NXbdEoEdZUaopeqWmFMKCT/VsYdn3WVSo8vB4MsCVXCXNvrn+CxNDhjg8FljQCr6LJKZRqGD/ mponO1OnElK2pqpFbbFxh6jwupiaV6R5uymzUwyc33J5BEdk1QKPvV7h0lRxblgacHR63ecIT e765J3UiptW+RaXaVSAJ8M1sM2vrNVjtPrFi11DgfeIY9msY5OQvK+Glan65AIgKVmAUZ/q1O Weue8Mp5Y4Wcw9dWthQD9vlupA/8IslJYuk7Nw9Qffca5DrL7pFvZ30uOW5GkjMqcFQkxXeCf l9H5m79XBFi0KgxBvprn//3Der35XODxGgdNZ7Ef50Md2qitGq1OIK80ky5cdABF9ec8eJpDA Oe2djI6gWPX3s3lTMk6lNNRvR+IVpWLLUCBWk4+BIYR7WIthvfl2zLsNxXGitoW9jbjFQqoIf u6IJl+2tMsXW5aQBBINPzCc0twYbWFhSkOBF+v3B+MP0Y/mxNUTpV9zKIrX5tqcyn9FOFyRRe NwVUvJdEGReiT158bzLnF/aLOf+Gce6zPpScZI0KNXWQPyPEtIzPgeULBr1TgM6L1ATyTh9pY 3K4swGPnQ1k3OrGkpXTbIinXyrimnwVOT2Xn7W6S/CQESLeqR7hgmJftZxH4+XG5XqY4JdIeu FLjzOmiXsV0XDlbubgzEeQJfcAEEakVGshIEWhDIcqR8tUGg+d7/cgnJwx62cly0M6yQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.75 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208307 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --B9aURtr66Q041UIXmLfJa9DMPftLJU9nn Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="D4HRXVO20pXRRlmKfadQH24G84r25SPtf"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Feature request/RFC: proper highlighting of code embedded in comments References: <930446db-6dad-72a0-d0cd-a0710e5c6ec3@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: --D4HRXVO20pXRRlmKfadQH24G84r25SPtf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-10-15 16:22, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 15.10.2016 18:19, Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel wrote: >=20 >> Am I missing another obvious solution? Has this topic been discussed = before? >=20 > mmm-mode? >=20 > And other tools and discussions about mixed-mode solutions. Thanks :) I was hoping that this kind of complexity wouldn't be needed, s= ince this is all a single mode. But maybe that perceived complexity just= reflects my lack of experience with mmm. Cheers, Cl=C3=A9ment. --D4HRXVO20pXRRlmKfadQH24G84r25SPtf-- --B9aURtr66Q041UIXmLfJa9DMPftLJU9nn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYAp3NAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjPewP/RPkIl75aH1NAuok5YRozCna 0fXiD74El3bVURynT3qJWjLgw0v/MXY/c9F3mXzQH+nrEVreF15GLpO45hxeBh/V RJH1rJ7DpFaXCMPD2YYXek8A934Q7NmQ+6tFniB4GCRGKG23yHXFjSNOldDE2D3I UTSMZs224MHJk8EhxmDCOgl8u96ThbMbCSO6iRt8zmjiCRrYK+q0v2qV4hJCgMLW l5IfFGKPjNFZir6540HrHse+TOpWa/l7ZsAHICqIumZYRywjZHjCUr3Q1MEEOr2b RjnMyF4cON0J5g67bSJrADIw7en83X5VO9OsENmbMGOocHUHTCFRbj+Vxvq78iKX rFo9Pv/B3VLmZd2sHjKeCqSO4iWWoSnzQVuhiHPq/c3jYWjmQT5GKGHZSDy7mXF6 tprg9tBMWq5EYghE1031sgW9/JcQ8kyIDtISde0+GiCUmzW53IfDEbLGxfHT/WyI O81+jdhb0U2OTM3hnXW0VXmaodMh8QyKZAyiF0D/hIECBO01gzgBit8ttuxkivZD qPcULDOgA01n/8dR5MyW3UFo0Vf6m8lwZJqo8lfnsrEcn/3SmXrm237GdziMLOna 6RY02MZY1cPV0WGsi3qYd9ZJOVsCwYEs/4wrv85/3SQ+ihdKD9B/ZyBSyXqkjzzz E8VsaTqXHE/+yuneyHkB =evcy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --B9aURtr66Q041UIXmLfJa9DMPftLJU9nn--