From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniele Nicolodi Subject: Re: [RFC] Change visibility for bracket links Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:31:54 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87bmyyold3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <65e1130f-ec6f-1409-e135-01acca1d1f53@grinta.net> <87r37lonua.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <6054e2d8-ce7b-de83-f35a-ba5103325d29@grinta.net> <87h98g5u67.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bujrP-0003Ep-Qc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:32:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bujrJ-0002wD-Sq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:32:02 -0400 Received: from zed.grinta.net ([109.74.203.128]:59100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bujrJ-0002un-Jj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:31:57 -0400 Received: from 688dnmac.campus.nist.gov (688msmac.bw.nist.gov [132.163.81.39]) (Authenticated sender: daniele) by zed.grinta.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C05CFE0324 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:31:55 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87h98g5u67.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 10/13/16 6:07 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Daniele Nicolodi writes: > >> Does this solve your problem? :) > > Not really. It makes my example more bearable, but using C-a is still > a workaround, and there are also many other dances to perform in various > other cases. So, I still think there is an usability issue that needs to > be fixed. > > As another data point, `org-hide-emphasis-markers' is nil by default, > because emphasized text can be a pain to edit when this variable is > non-nil. I don't think links should go the opposite way. Hi Nicolas, I understand the problem and I agree that editing links and text around them is not always straightforward. However I think that what you are proposing is a change in behavior that does not strictly solve a technical problem. As such, I believe, having the [ ] markers should be an option, and probably not enabled by default. Cheers, Daniele