From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs? Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:48:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <56E0D27E.3030303@cs.ucla.edu> <83k2lan7n3.fsf@gnu.org> <22241.24253.891410.492540@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457614119 24267 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2016 12:48:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com To: Ulrich Mueller , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 13:48:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ae00u-0004Gv-9h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:48:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae00t-0007a2-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:48:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae00p-0007XW-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae00m-0004WE-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:35717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae00m-0004Vn-7X; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l68so28648075wml.0; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:48:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0468A0yR6Y30cwRGS/TOXSPDgGotyGEoHIaAaaITijE=; b=UNAVq0+dQ533bVqhIIfmyiJbFAC8DsgmhfS31zprMLEmykfplsyH/5P/jdWJyH/TM5 l3SV/RFne46bZjgNKfVwpvfv20fxsn93L/c4DiqmjztnH1wVi7UXsgiPEAF9OheRCy+O oPO2WFPTdNUNMTtRWqpEcAjw6Iw46u+vIahPA+qP97JT5Q2atrXROFa1dt5KqnxHWEsH P++dw8nefo69yuV/mGBTwpew+l1mBJwydCA9AteUuC/hIcz79NbGQbV6xLyHlh77c+se z2kfkCdPoi7y0CJW7G0eWq7xtSrCc2qT3PLyK7Cd5feq+OkKEjbFOt0KSadgYwe7+8xZ LSeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0468A0yR6Y30cwRGS/TOXSPDgGotyGEoHIaAaaITijE=; b=cj+itfxQnUpGtJyr0qTOf8Y1BwhsjcYBAXsBBauQtWaSxGYWnfYne65WRSqRC74QLz j4daskrRh/w47fZbjBiq6ayJe7ecmhov53MhJiDChFQoFH4RY1WO+yuE8l+/Jp1oTaYF 0TBpmR3mtsLDrZTyQrsNLr6+QYiBHnM6AVHqAdj4hrMttyUyHhXKak8HnMXohyWC6L04 retjGSNJ4CEyL5gcRnYHg+6WNBNUjh/bRFWmJsK3pfhHDAi8HWE9XvAQuJCOMOxH8Yws dCzOt2xegaE5p8PbgmAal6qA7vt0xrgAewenmOhgOpJBnSMkm17RGt1GPiHcsIGTx9KU 2q7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK6rSlbOTzpgVtI58tK5F/u5Mf2DljIYEAFNJpaO4g9xV6oVcFwGcFd0QXF6GTgvQ== X-Received: by 10.194.94.229 with SMTP id df5mr4106233wjb.133.1457614095287; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:48:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v2sm3378334wmd.24.2016.03.10.04.48.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:48:14 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <22241.24253.891410.492540@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201371 Archived-At: On 03/10/2016 01:47 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Wouldn't that argument apply to etags as well? Exuberant Ctags has an > etags mode which can be enabled by the -e option, or by invoking the > program under the name etags. It wouldn't. etags development has been re-invigorated recently, with Eli taking over maintainership. And IIUC Debian[-based] packages switch to our etags when the emacs package is installed.