From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] widen-limits c331b66: Implement buffer-widen-limits functionality Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:24:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160322022539.16038.77264@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <8737riqouj.fsf@gmail.com> <221845e0-b194-433e-bfbc-105272ae5752@default> <87twjyp21k.fsf@gmail.com> <56F242E0.7060004@online.de> <877fgtpfrw.fsf@gmail.com> <56F293E7.2000703@online.de> <87a8lpnusg.fsf@gmail.com> <83r3f12oo5.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2D156.9040401@online.de> <83k2kt2i51.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2E643.4060903@online.de> <592bbafa-76ae-49d9-b5cd-644b3619a0d8@default> <87poukn8pl.fsf@gmail.com> <837fgs35q3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458822313 29342 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2016 12:25:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andreas.roehler@online.de, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Vitalie Spinu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 24 13:25:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aj4K3-0005gr-UV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:25:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49969 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj4K2-0000Ep-Oo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj4Jh-0000C5-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj4Jd-0008Dj-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]:33284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aj4Jc-0008De-SG; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:24:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l68so271979013wml.0; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:24:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jcQb1BEXd2ecljvjtoToLNjvd+y01CaeGdIRCe7KktA=; b=Xfm+KY2/EQa4PzEH1eOQ8KU5ho9En9krh66+F5aVbiTClfzoC2Rrn46y4Uo/XZDCVi 7nckvR3n9FUVI3UdMhPf4qHX5NAsIMg7vnS6Hq7Fim1IkhTQ2T4u0+PoWL+xhKm4MKh/ Nq1N+CZje8IHpdYusg1NQ8ZkSwxLWYm9eOubRjncf5fcqUPiq87mTeZpMBRycX5jnbgc 9RN7CYpUGEGLg2I3KCjtV5SesBHFS0nmB4lZ4/hcQTS+sDvyE8ajBhP2yX2dMY9fxqgP 2vdCDfC74wSIK4QuuA73n6LBEaUT7F7gNILNVIsAO+hgv5NsSnhnhlWfnwfSTGmQxhst +4Ug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jcQb1BEXd2ecljvjtoToLNjvd+y01CaeGdIRCe7KktA=; b=OvPStt/a5/RStCwKGF98XjhTmtXszqzDA5pj842WrFcw+P/L5W9kvZRoxutDjwYnew Z5zAQvfBNGQAX8W5I4ILBOyPOmhufzEg1nLK6Cv6DAKBzwK70zCUaSb6H9XMUU0fIxOB UITjvJIxs7Z5Nu8biXOmdVf8bYEteiKU/Rfq6rzlptKHisZg4H7pXH0WufubF61Cq+39 ZeUQapcSL/GTo7xhrekbQx8sE63acSeEoceSH5cvjV/XquVOv3HRv6dosKdDqfnxfZVX gkTKQqrGaoBZ/qLPFNyrpExwBEVRuakxesm1zWS6I7YBtWncCjl4nyqxEMIgeoDZlQ3W yUyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJYFfP9C9lGhincfoBMXGHmhQXllZE1qeuy85Ozj6n7V1KZ/aBWv5SFdNff/1zIzw== X-Received: by 10.194.83.42 with SMTP id n10mr9716536wjy.20.1458822280037; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm7145252wjb.46.2016.03.24.05.24.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:24:39 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <837fgs35q3.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202166 Archived-At: On 03/24/2016 05:38 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> [prog-indentation-context] > Should we rip them out, as long as it's not too late? Yes. If nobody beats me to it, I'll revert it in emacs-25 this weekend. The yet-unfinished discussion aside, it doesn't look ready for 25.1 either way. I'm sorry you had to work on documenting it; hopefully we can reuse the pieces of that text, or at least refer to it when documenting the eventual alternative approach.