From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next Emacs RC tomorrow? Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:36:27 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87bn12q8as.fsf@petton.fr> <135b23c3-305e-3b2b-4f09-9be29cab2ed2@yandex.ru> <83d1lghf5k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470839933 11632 195.159.176.226 (10 Aug 2016 14:38:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:38:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/47.0 Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 16:38:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUed-0002ru-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:38:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42008 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUea-00021G-NU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUcR-00014Y-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUcQ-000154-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]:36201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUcQ-00014p-9E; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l2so45237706qkf.3; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:36:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FnPXQQENzi1TBV1Zxy4VfFuZfvzL/0FapYl35ZXuO6w=; b=PN58AIZQrLh12hyK0cEF1+rig57H7NVdDYouKWrD3bB9cJ81hbJXCLZaU9NvEln57+ IiQe+yQEez1Wy3tnd7CcaYmS15OH/0lDGKsMEmabCULTLJ1xswiX1ZzqVhRsGyulb50g r2qNjaCz2D850NZTb7zKQHi2iouZX4LQ3oIsnGXAxCWENafmD6zVST5hgMd2uvD+BFvB 4VkgC9egIp5FCQvwiJ1X40Bg8t5ptAnBUfJ3pcixLE2SVW4dO62SuD2Nksfqrksg8klE OiIPa+tL2eTpQquSILFpeczReWUO6xcvRtwyzXHRAxf3ari1FD0ihb9QbMHEaTL70ff7 HDQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FnPXQQENzi1TBV1Zxy4VfFuZfvzL/0FapYl35ZXuO6w=; b=HVL+MP7SYr0Nzis5BX4TODPjmgi0gklpY1EP7uiEand9AsZSMzoJE9k0JK1OnUr1+z ftPx9++tJ4CPYCky2BWjRhg85qsQVr9VIQR/Wi1iRymQosQeHBs/oeGVuaVXBE1AEy9g G8MFNwoW0yPHPfQL7ATw7lR8o/8Sf7BkWSr320Yd7aYF7vWK9szN+xZnnjb8zPXu6w8y q0odPRCDP8149AS/6G0FzJZ200rQVlGwS+5dvV1WmiHxSfso5z5XgMxTDP/d9a+fwBwD xuADwQgsfUlu2CXuuC04z6CIoUUL2bS+SwUgjDD54mqi7xX9i+BGWTnCBGi+Th432aLT aNCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutgd6NVtAgVVWoRBLgxgB8KBTxT70Hom9iqwdhLSQ79wn8zesz9PO75sFHYQs2Vrg== X-Received: by 10.46.0.92 with SMTP id 89mr730320lja.37.1470839789654; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h31sm7636651ljh.27.2016.08.10.07.36.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83d1lghf5k.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206533 Archived-At: On 08/10/2016 05:28 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'd like to, but it doesn't sound like we have a consensus about the > way to fix it. > > Would it work to make the buffer unibyte _after_ inserting the URL? > Does anyone of those who objected to making it unibyte to begin with > object to this proposal? Which buffer do you mean? Please take a look at my last two messages in that bug, by the way.