From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Add new functions to mark/unmark/delete all bookmarks Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20200724005105.11f85d5f@pineapple> <03f641b5-9ff9-476f-afab-e674e4027d27@default> <20200724110733.7cf5c4d5@pineapple> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35601"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Matthew White Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 24 19:08:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jz1BH-000982-Bc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:08:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50726 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jz1BG-0005AJ-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:08:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jz1AR-0003qp-CE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:07:31 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:49324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jz1AP-0006KS-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:07:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06OH7SEj127762; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:07:28 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=HXpo9WAHZN2kicgB0WoI3E/7TOaTxS2b3KXOi9spQjw=; b=KZLQKmFeuVLks8eF6bv4hC//CalNiynFbkJkEDotTMAayVQIsGt/pKDqD75XuUZ7aXny RrH2hZAr/d0zt2LRAxAUEG+5yLCKzl4FxMeIM0DM6uvc+bFahULTTVkHBp96pAncd2iQ 8Gnt1QhLWT2ISrfGhlyEk8XAciysrwUYeCK0SEsmlTJonxdUrUvnFOJBvv0BGgMYYP9b mltKyZRSlNwjFoXhfnsJFRkwwafKOjzZpuf/pyOTE3VdobWYSj3D85ZV7ry+WpBwPqql i6fOivkXvDHey4dWErBGx+h2XdpMAAqgouTiosGgvptGvqBjWhUgimIahIZB7iNpsB4E ZQ== Original-Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32d6kt4fwa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:07:28 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06OGwKVm081832; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:07:27 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32g38wawqc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:07:27 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 06OH7PNe022128; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:07:26 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5017.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9692 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007240130 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9692 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007240131 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/24 12:43:27 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253194 Archived-At: > > I assure you that I never looked into the code of Bookmark+, hence > > there is no code I borrowed in writing my patch to add some common > > features to bookmark.el. I'm sorry if people think things that way. >=20 > His code is covered by the GPL *and* he signed the copyright paperwork, > so I don't think his issue is the reverse: he'd rather that the "new > code" be taken from his to reduce the difference between bookmark.el and > bookmark+.el. Yes. To the extent that some of the stuff in Bookmark+ were to be integrated into vanilla bookmark.el, I wouldn't need to include it anymore in Bookmark+ (except for older Emacs releases). IOW, a plus for me, in terms of Bookmark+ maintenance. A more important reason for others is that (IMHO) the Bookmark+ versions of overlapping features are generally better than the vanilla versions. And there are a lot more features, many of which could be added to vanilla bookmark.el with little trouble, I expect. I'm not volunteering to help with any such integration (I haven't the time, energy, or will), but I'd be happy to help with understanding the Bookmark+ code if someone did try to integrate some of the functionality.