From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: eww and bookmarks Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <87k1163jz5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="57461"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Matthias Meulien , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 20 18:32:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbRdX-000Em0-Pw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 18:32:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbRdW-0007kE-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbRcs-00076a-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:31:26 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:55934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbRcq-0001s1-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04KGRcoC001253; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:31:22 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=tQtbAsuCaYX263BwD8TA7tTDX+4OAvMF12fF3ZQgq9Q=; b=L6jkfSRAeVmPh8UkFEZ0nAuSLVcr90QqgnNPx3GxHaFCVbEPZmKHp7NcgLnP/YefE4IA Z2fgaKDL2Rc+Ac5nxv2kLsC27TPT3VyQWxoApSfrZbXOLuiigOjHdGYsk0Z/J6wxMSBv z93x5l6sgkdlCb2gJjD3g4csfqofGJYMYXdKN4SArF2MOcrMbf1AuZlDQjBmAd5MSvf8 tPcJUjcuIGiXCiQbqUjtGVjAgVXfGFStiIiJr/C0vFyMf0RSb//c+PacowUzy+DlAVxg JOv1qdGNVDx1rxCsYtvfoTwAveWzRT4iwNpnfzVcSaWz1Kn8HBotMM6fwR5RbP9bjFnh PQ== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3127krc5x5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 May 2020 16:31:20 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04KGMSuC042746; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:29:19 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 314gm7bwgc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 May 2020 16:29:19 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0008.oracle.com (abhmp0008.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 04KGTIAI024089; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:29:18 GMT In-Reply-To: <87k1163jz5.fsf@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4993.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9627 signatures=668686 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=911 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005200134 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9627 signatures=668686 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=942 malwarescore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005200134 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.86; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2130.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/20 10:46:35 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251072 Archived-At: > Is there any reason why eww doesn't use bookmark.el? I could not > found any explanation in eww.el nor the info documentation of > Emacs. >=20 > I'd prefer to have all my bookmarks available in a single buffer > and managed in a single place; And I am happy so far with > bookmark.el for usual bookmarks. Are you interested in eww to > support bookmark.el (could be through a customization variable for > example)? This has come up before. See thread "EWW improvements: open in new buffer, tags, quickmarks, search engines, ..." If you use Bookmark+ then you can create and use ordinary Emacs bookmarks for EWW, not the EWW pseudo-bookmarks. By "ordinary" I mean that they are like other bookmarks, show up in your bookmarks list, are jumped to in the usual way, etc. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-05/msg00041.html