From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Mendler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62776: 30.0.50; 'project-find-file' ignoring 'file-name-history' Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:54:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <97545727-7123-ca74-3d2e-4ac5c6d8f25a@gutov.dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Dmitry Gutov , Rudolf =?UTF-8?Q?Adamkovi=C4=8D?= , 62776@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 19 07:55:33 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pp0my-0008YI-T6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:55:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pp0mb-000648-Qg; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:55:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pp0mU-00063c-Bn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pp0mT-0006V4-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pp0mT-0000Mw-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Mendler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62776 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62776-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62776.16818836751301 (code B ref 62776); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2023 05:54:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60918 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pp0m3-0000Ku-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:54:35 -0400 Original-Received: from server.qxqx.de ([178.63.65.180]:42925 helo=mail.qxqx.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pp0m0-0000Ke-N7 for 62776@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 01:54:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxqx.de; s=mail1392553390; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gRnFJk8nLH+izCD9nv1a8DEGp6hTa0yVpud1HkBw8/M=; b=mFHwlM+YlP2LEPytaCzzJumEkk mY3uTdDDEz0WYM6rdBnu+w+z/yvtjx9Xvfz9o/wj1IpyTkTW6Qo3KCYavRNXGxQqJGqEd9GLr85WC hGTvrooPCVhAhqCV4wTE3k2CTBlGsi/QMOGTfkCbArGOaM7yfAKA0iGG2dN3wQvyPyNc=; Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <97545727-7123-ca74-3d2e-4ac5c6d8f25a@gutov.dev> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260260 Archived-At: On 4/19/23 03:54, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > It's possible that vertico--history-hash is confused by our manipulation > of the history entries -- like how they are stored as absolute file > names now (bug#58447). Yes, that's right. A tweak to the hash manipulation would be needed. On the other hand we cannot handle all special cases in vertico--history-hash. For such cases one can set the vertico-sort-function or vertico-sort-override-function variables per command. Daniel