From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 07:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <8736wa9c5s.fsf@gmx.de> <87wotkn6do.fsf@gmx.de> <874lgn8x6l.fsf@gmx.de> <87sh44pisz.fsf@gmx.de> <87a7qbitc7.fsf@gmx.de> <878t5tdsfc.fsf@gmx.de> <83wotcpzub.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmaiuwml.fsf@gmx.de> <877el6uwio.fsf@gmx.de> <7c28f9d8-e2bb-4778-ab92-92707f12718f@default> <837el6t8r3.fsf@gnu.org> <39939ea5-a7c2-400a-9ac1-4df7cf4fcb42@default> <871sbbrk9m.fsf@gmx.de> <8b294041-12e6-1fd6-28af-dde388c9927f@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533567685 6119 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2018 15:01:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:01:25 +0000 (UTC) To: =?utf-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUGl0LUNsYXVkZWw=?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 06 17:01:20 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fmh0a-0001Sc-GK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 17:01:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34529 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmh2f-0005DX-BR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 11:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmgwv-0000IZ-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmgwq-0000V3-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:34862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmgwp-0000UG-VC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w76ErphR048979; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:57:26 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=NGgxqH+G+fRBGEgCnG7SUp0PSI/Zi98NYK4gNBha3Gk=; b=iwBamFU4uHWVSDmk+X7vKSChfDo1Kt1t3Mjd6mktR9R3RMR6IIx3+RNPtC5UsJycfLdA a9ooQAMyOBRNoPXTxYl4j1uhOZyRtq75be2LsGWYkqaMnVodOKPkfDD6u9R3wMUO8enm qf1Na9aaVMjOAEqdoufmsxhomZs0mwuUjHddZQ29atk2y0jni+lmcSnfkXVZn/FPtdwt 76RLxox7xEMt5SpzzNSAEHhMVWMkHXIptzlZKhlzv+kfpLVOYb95rp8TJFve25MrTid0 7HxXnwbPCBs2TMnHAIk5qQ7NTrDEAd5wtRqOWE5hZA2i4O9BS+EEeHhpgqH/avTN9WGz dQ== Original-Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2kn4spn7na-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 06 Aug 2018 14:57:25 +0000 Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w76EvO3C016029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:57:25 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0002.oracle.com (abhmp0002.oracle.com [141.146.116.8]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w76EvOhP022840; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:57:24 GMT In-Reply-To: <8b294041-12e6-1fd6-28af-dde388c9927f@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4717.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8976 signatures=668707 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=18 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=948 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808060157 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.85 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228216 Archived-At: > >> Wasn't there are a proposal at one point to do something > >> similar for C-x 4 and C-x 5 so that there didn't have to be > >> -other-window and -other-frame variants of so many > >> commands? > >> I'm not aware of such a proposal (which only means that my memory is > > bad), but it makes sense. >=20 > Indeed, that would be very nice (I don't remember such a proposal either, > though) Let's please not go there, in this thread. There are downsides, as well as = upsides, to such a proposal. We've discussed it before. We can discuss it a= gain if needed. But let's not branch this thread for such a discussion.