From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Strange behavior in search-forward-regexp? Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:00:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <64B6A146-3995-4FD2-9867-7FC681AF9E5D@Web.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139730329 13460 80.91.229.2 (12 Feb 2006 07:45:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 08:45:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8Bv5-0007Dm-EJ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:45:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8Bv4-0001hq-Js for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:45:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F814K-0007TF-KQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F80xX-0004r5-6E for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F80Gp-0007Yj-1N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:18:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.82.193] (helo=xproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F803F-0000E5-S9 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:04:57 -0500 Original-Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t11so452190wxc for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:00:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OFys9F6UAfGmFjD8UQEE/8lNCVakzATYc/fUvj5q1V7pFW2LxYuTgA00Pm1FZ813Z131y2XLiyHluGwUnnkOZ8/XJhMxtKnMyxAla6gwlfZY8hCxscrt/ETJRBZqeLPXGI1NpgPy+5m0AqTovEuYHrn/sSDujPUnKppEGhMARew= Original-Received: by 10.70.89.6 with SMTP id m6mr785285wxb; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:00:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.70.62.9 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:00:45 -0800 (PST) Original-To: Peter Dyballa In-Reply-To: <64B6A146-3995-4FD2-9867-7FC681AF9E5D@Web.DE> Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:45:02 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:33158 Archived-At: > > In buffer 0, test1 and test2 willreturn the same result, "row1;test1", > > but in buffer 1, test1 will return "\nrow1;test1" (\n is a newline) > > and test2 "row1;test1". > > Could you check the encodings used in the two buffers? Actually, I was bluffing when I wrote I had two buffers. :) It was easier t= o explain that way. And, to answer your question: Coding system for saving this buffer: 1 -- iso-latin-1 (alias: iso-8859-1 latin-1)