From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65027: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Document .elpaignore behavior in the Emacs Lisp manual Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 12:34:17 -0800 Message-ID: References: <761581a0-fa77-e89c-01e8-d0baeae838f5@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15559"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, corwin@bru.st, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, info@protesilaos.com, 65027@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 27 21:35:06 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rTpOL-0003og-VX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 21:35:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTpOD-000849-7Z; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:34:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTpOB-000840-9A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:34:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTpOB-0001mt-1c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:34:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTpOI-0004Rh-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 20:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65027 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65027-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65027.170638767517052 (code B ref 65027); Sat, 27 Jan 2024 20:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65027) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2024 20:34:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56017 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTpNq-0004Qx-VT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:34:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]:61481) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTpNo-0004Qk-FS for 65027@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:34:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3bda4bd14e2so1167647b6e.2 for <65027@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 12:34:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706387659; x=1706992459; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xku2YPjIM3NZv4oM8m9NfWHZAWMaq6IAm581/eHRu0k=; b=noI2VAdL7aOwUzn8ltWGfVOFlt+QrKh8Ke+ToGJxw9qHLW/s56Nq/lrOEDn9sqFTXO bYyyBIgKOAM5W9qVuUzFwA40gz/Kp0SEDQB7UWLIuORDfb3NF/KBYBR/EsMlFpcMMC1J 2k8CFv+UrRZEu3tX62J7ZscPlG7jM8pHhuYiGKELOhW9MfGmn1nxhu0o3AsNZQZus6gy YRtyp/+3XrYfLBIBQEAUk3x8ohS9XcjtmHMpdGNvWtX08Z1tOHmLW4W4Hn4+qqePeHZb xqw+wywzAyaRLDAwGL31hnT35otvduTgUegIb/prjdif9x6G2axmF9PkAxn7HLDy0lR5 Je+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706387659; x=1706992459; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xku2YPjIM3NZv4oM8m9NfWHZAWMaq6IAm581/eHRu0k=; b=DefZANVxiPhfGOvN27T14pnplwMSa73SvnmUtFLeQPJMpGu5ihKp1NsqOzTNzcE8jZ mqITDcr9ozUoZOuSMiRpPmZkgMcZGRBiWcRogVXWTmu9xKvjlaOn1FSnXAAxtnW9FouZ l+4dAXtQ7g6ECx7wTLNpe1b7pK+y9omt0HiYMt5w0r+5utT/uCW0ZmGbhJl99x3WWRNT G520SEOutShBtqCCjUS15HJ1HKKT2mtMP2/Aim27XUGXBDfGFX7K78LluvrTcoU8rRxe cudj4gWmcCW6cTfwdUHjXLvKTlvWEBtGWOwZv4e1PSDfvTJhw9LfsidUeVtGzf990OG5 03Jw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx7r6pkKZaJvskwufl6RdtvnJk9lf43NCZ9eO+i1q38rjRJlGFx dnashkGuXu6nyUY96+qdsHFSP7P69C6l9pR/YQRBlQMrJd/UOOoP X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEpU2GAgoaKy/dJFwSCGpnNmSokoax9fVFFskPQS0YlZH1PMYE5DPY0b3fpIzstrp+rxfkqEA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:d4c:b0:3bd:e70e:c5e0 with SMTP id w12-20020a0568080d4c00b003bde70ec5e0mr3642368oik.36.1706387659162; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 12:34:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (076-168-148-233.res.spectrum.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id jh1-20020a170903328100b001d752c4f180sm2808523plb.94.2024.01.27.12.34.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Jan 2024 12:34:18 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279035 Archived-At: On 1/11/2024 11:35 AM, Jim Porter wrote: > On 1/10/2024 1:49 PM, Stefan Kangas wrote: >> But while we wait for that work to complete, is there any reason not to >> install the below patch?  Because we currently don't have any >> documentation for .elpaignore, and it's kind of frustrating to have to >> tell people that it exists over and over. >> >> Thoughts/objections?  Thanks in advance. > > Makes sense to me. If others agree, I can merge my patch. Since no one has had any further comments in the last couple weeks, I've now merged my patch to master as 744a10a4d72. Of course, we can work on a more elaborate packaging manual in the future. I'll leave this bug open for now to discuss that, but if maintainers prefer, we could always close this and open a new bug specifically about the packaging manual side of things.