RE: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line

[Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>]

> I'm not quite sure why you're even asking these questions, Drew, so I
> think I'll withdraw from this discussion, since nothing useful is being
> achieved.

Trying to find out what you are really saying, and how it might
apply to Emacs development.  You have a strong belief that each
function should do one thing and one thing well.  It would be
helpful, if that is to be a guideline or if we can learn from
it, to flesh out what you mean by it.

If it's clear to you and you don't care whether it's clear to
others, that's OK too.  As I said, I think that such things
are usually clearer in the context of discussing concrete
features or code.  No doubt there will be occasions to learn
what you mean for specific examples.

My guess is that what you prefer here is probably something
I would prefer too, but I'm not sure.  The devil, as well as
interesting guidelines, are likely in the details.