From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:51:59 +0300 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <97DA7804-F647-4A1D-B8E0-AFFE7A324C64@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="43668"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Cc: Yuan Fu , Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , ndame To: Andrea Corallo , Tim Cross Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 24 17:53:32 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jS0dw-000BGt-AP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:53:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS0dv-0002bo-Aa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS0cW-0000zt-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS0cV-0004rk-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]:41359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS0cV-0004p8-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id g13so11447310wrb.8 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:52:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pxklgjo0zg5OIrvWDvKtr16NmlvnHo17Tgy/zh4p/vA=; b=cDdKm7kXk6A6wfIt1VEae1UrBHAOk2jllaKku9Y9DfVKY98pkmTb3gWbbFhl0z7nM0 hwiBTElq1gPtowztuIdSwPBbR7L7rBRUekn3FBAEqA02lo/NtpCoI2GRlZqC6MPvsGys bUB0mQsox0k7n5PkMDinK13yE8l+llp7XgxpTOIFsLt6WBnAuu7FKCjhufkD+qA20hHD Ovfzt05Hkei2yGanwwiDLjLtFwQW1uozwythmkTsW9SKD2w5lwUuAfFUDIhqmkKw6x58 3mJ871npevL1NhBMgnzw7gON77Cx0eF9TxMEOMM5fCA9K6nAaVp5eO8OAqtOdkrpuGbV EwyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pxklgjo0zg5OIrvWDvKtr16NmlvnHo17Tgy/zh4p/vA=; b=LmJr93Kq9hBvkFgquQC5/N8CdAU0cX37FpsTa/eZ3gVgiKW5Kvnu5LM5qTvflow+Aq kTpUYrseB8VprkSRNYM+e5q5NQnLEjo3wsm9Ap8wnoa1AOcxZ4z0CcO8BC1ElEtrBDQX xz35iNv3WWiPFRsECdgiKUg7/9iathuIFgswngEfIbtiOpwQlm01LNg7l7uQSahPcp7+ 6v6Fp8cy1LEHGq5d4P9MDp+pU+URMiHLpiWGKbF4m4jca3oB7X/SSTYh2SDERHIO9viV xOLjzv7LdPehkM27ERIVNxRQgF9tp7kYi/sAJ+RqOa8yEYbBp4CH8L6iJ6yjajLxGeUV /l1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ//3DaLTj3Hz6TESFsuOLiRW0qPEoL7hiPSBEyPXSa9zeRkOBD l3SObT2TWVggFOHQHQURzbTjRKA23XQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJFwOo0ZscpEYoZVLUtM2JYxUw3CWQw31dA0Iz7NTN8iniO90UguqqfWrqqqeuk/QvzO4pdUw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f187:: with SMTP id h7mr11952133wro.331.1587743521865; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t20sm3232108wmi.2.2020.04.24.08.52.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:52:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42f; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42f.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67 X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::42f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247706 Archived-At: On 24.04.2020 11:56, Andrea Corallo wrote: > IMO the comparison does not stand. We are not talking about a big > volume of binaries hard to verify that are continuously pushed by > developers. With the current volume of commits we have on ELPA the eyes > of other developers on elpa-diffs are sufficient. FWIW, as one of the "other developers", I'm not fond of the volume of the commits already. Especially when they come from packages which I don't personally care about.