From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: master a6b5985: Avoid duplicated character classes in rx Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:45:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <20191203142243.9552.27513@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191203142246.0615C20A2B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <79A83C7D-610F-4CA4-B5E9-7F11FD8A9365@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="66107"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 06 20:48:45 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1idJal-000H3a-W8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 20:48:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idJaj-0006dk-PT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45697) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idJZt-0006bI-5F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:47:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idJZr-0000ts-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:47:48 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:59566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idJZq-0000dn-5g; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xB6JZ1eL084881; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 19:47:37 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=fCbGf/MF+CctlCw4o0LMOQoR+WWHbmMC+coeWpCFasU=; b=Z0C3LA8aY6+wOgPOrJDuOOr1PzUjYZyTddDKHuFevKP+IEqSXIozF5+x+XkUtkLexq+R hf62vBmyoubFZUo7ZJRWzxOpkXMeQKJSLX6uUU3Gge4NTXa7dCWLXaZh96Q8z4byDKj/ d3nDDd+zmKoNBqORSiMr7KfATfCxHiWji+c7B5KRRZBV5Cea4fdS/io7ZBkKCG3DGqED AS2QkrFxmypx8EmNFjZRVgO3GNlwK3lKvz+/R2Q+z/9s56AWPW7U0g1xk8eF9c4+aT6f WLaMVDB4tWY8YXmLOUH+Ns5Hl/698A0cMjRQyB6eRvdRiIEg9inAb04/7kJbti+fe5u2 vw== Original-Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2wkh2rwyxn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:47:37 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xB6Jd6vo055562; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 19:45:36 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2wqm0tabxd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:45:36 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0012.oracle.com (abhmp0012.oracle.com [141.146.116.18]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xB6JjZ9C007961; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 19:45:35 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4927.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9463 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=918 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912060158 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9463 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912060158 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.85 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243195 Archived-At: FWIW, I disagree that it's necessary, or even worthwhile/helpful, to avoid = using the return value of `push'. And I think the return value should be documented. (This is like not documenting the return value of `progn' or `setq`'. ;-))