From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36894: Restore frameset focus and selectedness Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:29:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878sscwovy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <877e7rwbv7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <834l2uconb.fsf@gnu.org> <874l2uug62.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83y305btde.fsf@gnu.org> <87h86q8b3m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a7ci9n4j.fsf@gnu.org> <87mugf4e8l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8336i6tolz.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2zw3gb8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <12822045-5c5f-f575-8315-86a85657ecaa@gmx.at> <8336i3su1b.fsf@gnu.org> <871rxmnumm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="246409"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36894@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 16 09:38:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWp1-00120g-Sn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:38:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWp0-0003yd-D1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:38:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWgV-0003kU-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:30:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWgU-0007Jq-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWgU-0007Jl-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWgT-00016x-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:30:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36894 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36894-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36894.15659405734220 (code B ref 36894); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:30:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2019 07:29:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWg1-000160-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:29:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:40245) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyWfz-00015n-6I for 36894@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:29:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1565940557; bh=pqk3EwltGSyKCNYZHiGvPE4MHaklkUlP96bVIu9m1No=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CEtbdA1J64QSt+VNN91Sfkbbl/SKhGJfWZo1DkKZdVtL+bjPw7dhtDA/rQz3fXKj8 79A1K1aqKc+a76eC/O3bYUUrNGzuVNWOfo2womqw76cdRq1BCzWudVRxPLZZ2G5mDT E+hqPdPcrkQj11paBIzKlcSlZ2JK1rSKtUdPlYPI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.249.86]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LomJ1-1iVMFq212h-00gsEZ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:29:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871rxmnumm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:mHz3+4bBXSpKBJQR2sWtZ+KlEFzOhc1bePRxjFnLITywvxruiy4 V7FEQNvwoa764m/1CuxqxlISpY5JDTtgtROKykThfbCOa7HMdCEG61mV/NAZh98C4MNgacU KZX9Kx3uFXLVvVjBFo0aX2HuX+u7LnSTu6LH1UySvBM50Pa8kMZv5kFdNyInEgGPLgxBfZ6 7c47BZX+XAe9Uam4BzVuQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:9qZs6EOLhm8=:pRbi2le00/l++2Lvmfe9Gz XnGWISttLWD0mXYHpp/heZ/5sYHdVsGf3OVJmiEuwMQ9AJm+JRG/P+rsDsXwQFPhDeWPz7dZn S1VPu31hVrvYqoFNS+ymL2MpR8BHW9Ir6yYvHurLZ+HOXxS+UpbilEgMcvLZZMA8PXG7EJW+L L4x/azNspPoN1R1Tk9+0r7rfQUUemap55giVn7/BaLhrxWh8GkPHNoeOlOymyF9JPErZNIehr vodY7rOUTRvNhfSS+1qz1K14zMqcIlU6fJ3h/XjGZ4qarplBGrrLpqzQju4CTF3/NkAw5iIvu x4iPS+i7R8QzJKSdh74PyFTqytYkmjZ8Lv5ONV/B6Yfoa1dwo4rI1YyqDlt0dzCJ3PySsm0Yb 33Lkj/GLuo6Y5iOhFlMcVym+oPn4uuRH8In776ppTq++MAtQ/FB/NhljV2yrMehCFxF14wPIB tCtbU4cOCdzk6E+O8+eYik0qcGor7tCgkxVHrQpxuCttkLeeCqRM58LgiRNOmDK2mvvlZcmXF 6+/+dp+owQ1QgqCSY8I9X4fyU6SGeuFx+CofOl6RFQ/+oZVkO0xVBaDoYLAzxr+3wBMnhBfRz lxlXFpZeQMUB4JUSD/kw7Dbr5dafG4yqTNFrx9QOiZOyUOh1h1PY9vsYyylj7DKw2WN/D4xSH YjeZb21VUdyqfke5nh21Y/NIk8aXLhZzD/2aTbqFr8euLcPAYuWBvVrWY3bTDrDq7qm5QrlCP UscMp0wW6KUr3ks7qE4SJv6XAy2abFiV3D8kufdbcCfSjxxe0cXtBRoH+HDMUTdO96kTdj7Z X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165191 Archived-At: > I see that the MATE window manager doesn't select the new frame after > > (make-frame '((no-focus-on-map . t))) > > Then I don't understand the logic of make-frame-command: > > (defun make-frame-command () > (interactive) > (if (display-graphic-p) > (make-frame) > (select-frame (make-frame)))) > > On a graphic display it doesn't select the new frame explicitly, > maybe on the assumption that all window managers should select it > afterwards? IIUC it intentionally doesn't care and doesn't make any guarantees. See the info on 'make-frame': This function itself does not make the new frame the selected frame. *Note Input Focus::. The previously selected frame remains selected. On graphical terminals, however, the windowing system may select the new frame for its own reasons. martin