From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk (Aquila Deus) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [OT] Emacs under attack Date: 9 Sep 2004 07:56:29 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094742004 30083 80.91.224.253 (9 Sep 2004 15:00:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 09 16:59:46 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5QOo-0001bx-00 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 16:59:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5QU8-0007zA-KA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 11:05:16 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 21 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.134.2.204 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094741789 23443 127.0.0.1 (9 Sep 2004 14:56:29 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:125205 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:20559 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:20559 Carsten Weinberg wrote in message news:... > Aquila Deus wrote: > > >Hello buddies! > > > >Look this: http://www.php-editors.com/review/ > > > >They don't list emacs there but put it in dark and smelly "All > >unreviewed PHP Editors"!! > > > >What's worse is that vim has been reviewed and voted by 57 bastards! > >(however it's not 5 stars yet, this must be left for emacs :) > > > > > > > > do you really believe that the dudes voting for vi are 'bastards'? I do when I use emacs, but not when I use vim However, I was using slickedit when I voted it :)