All I did was to follow up on a suggested path and study technical ways
to getting Clojure editing support in Emacs, better than what we have
now, which is 0. I think is a pretty reasonable thing to do on
emacs-devel. It's not an immoral thing to do and I'm not coming for His
Highness The Great Clojure Authority Life's Work.
Joao, I've tried to be polite, but you behave like a total jerk right now. That's really disappointing as you used to be one of my Emacs heroes for a very long time. That makes me very sad. Such attitude alienates a lot of people from emacs-devel IMO.
Eli, I hope you'll agree that such attitude is really counter-productive.
On Sun, Sep 3, 2023, at 5:46 PM, João Távora wrote:
> And even if Emacs were to develop its own competing Clojure mode (which I
> say it should not), it MUST have a name of its own and not create
Eli has already stated very clearly this is a non-issue, stating --
quite accurately -- that noone who speaks for the Emacs project has
suggested it. Earlier I had said clearly I don't care and it's not up
to me. If it _were_ up to me -- which again it's not -- up I would
pursue a technical solution.
So no need to freak out really.
All I did was to follow up on a suggested path and study technical ways
to getting Clojure editing support in Emacs, better than what we have
now, which is 0. I think is a pretty reasonable thing to do on
emacs-devel. It's not an immoral thing to do and I'm not coming for His
Highness The Great Clojure Authority Life's Work.
João