From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6419: A suggestion for easier editing of lists in Custom buffers Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <87ft6esqn2.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29983"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lennart Borgman , 6419@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mauro Aranda , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 21 19:04:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHWz-0007fW-9D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:04:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41940 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHWy-0007bh-2F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHWr-0007bN-Up for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHWr-0001jZ-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHWr-0007JK-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6419 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 6419-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6419.160329980228047 (code B ref 6419); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6419) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 17:03:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHWE-0007IJ-EQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:35996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHWB-0007I4-Dj for 6419@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:03:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09LGwgV5102212; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:03:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=vnscJbjWALXJftrwy1iP6t7borp4tLnO4ey/IXLzGTA=; b=DMR7VuKAlCXp2Gdxytecdn4yxB3hyXxyUOrx6+RpptKXU+5j07caPFjmvLt4LxPVwXia Op7h05yVUenZ7M57+243QXYuk8Y0Ki+t/sqF2z/hfI13kmzFyO/SmM9uX4XecLJH7++h aZ/09jUs1jt75HwsfMlyWK1c+zWCf3/+8wdxsBgRuevi0K9SHUnYeDlUwq5T3+ai0eVG hqCtmiNCYqNcT76d9rZYkd4ky0eOsli30EuOnBcaXk18KD+ePfvctrdhqrXg6bgorW/v YvoLnlWE5l3Q4EzdA1HpL/sbSuzRuifX4AVFm5u6eZUikn5GZN9KA+iRBK9+UzN515XW PA== Original-Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 349jrpssxf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:03:13 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09LGxfaC142009; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:03:13 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 348agyw9ex-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:03:13 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0004.oracle.com (abhmp0004.oracle.com [141.146.116.10]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 09LH3Bu9026201; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:03:12 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5056.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9780 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010210124 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9780 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010210124 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191187 Archived-At: "Insert a new item (or a previously deleted one) into the list at this posi= tion." Should "a previously deleted one" be "the last-deleted one"? If you use INS in one customize buffer after using DEL in another, or after using DEL in another part of the same buffer (but not part of the same sequence), is that last-deleted item inserted? Or is it only the last-deleted (if any) from the same sequence? "If there is a recently deleted child, the new widget is that deleted child." Same question/problem. Any recently deleted child? What if there are several? Is it the last-deleted that's used? (I see that the code says "last-deleted".) "from the known childrens" -> "from the known children"