From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26742: Display bug with composed strings Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 01:15:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83inljisik.fsf@gnu.org> <72a56579-8a99-10c6-9c84-edaf954c59c0@live.com> <83d1bri4vg.fsf@gnu.org> <834lx3i1k6.fsf@gnu.org> <8337cni0i7.fsf@gnu.org> <871ss7oz7f.fsf@linux-m68k.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uxki5E7WHUgHNjTCge9AcIOKdwnVjP0ci" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1493788577 15104 195.159.176.226 (3 May 2017 05:16:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 05:16:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cc: 26742@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 03 07:16:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5mdz-0003kH-U8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 07:16:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34780 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5me3-00049W-Tl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 01:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41123) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5mdx-00049F-Vm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 01:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5mdu-00051t-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 01:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5mdu-00051d-N1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 01:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5mdu-0000mA-Dp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 01:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 05:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26742 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26742-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26742.14937885442958 (code B ref 26742); Wed, 03 May 2017 05:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26742) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2017 05:15:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5mdc-0000le-Kp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 01:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:60392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5mda-0000lP-7N for 26742@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2017 01:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.189.26.125] ([18.189.26.125]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002 [212.227.15.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lyvo0-1e9pZe3bMW-014AlH; Wed, 03 May 2017 07:15:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871ss7oz7f.fsf@linux-m68k.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cDRlJUMbOxs/fBYuFwrnqwskdoyZTjSUNzv9XegwATB3zZSlF76 NXQ7XSXrqXGcpbs2BdK45tdWfRPU6DfLdJ64bD49J02Peh1DAbIWLDJFWDFXw1yPXpTIUM5 fFidTWOPpwHBkPl2qXlY+WfRgLjgJPUm7wiNpaV1XpRelKSu7tT05vxmB8NfOF7FPbn9zuz MGUoPZV9qY10M+7E6ZPlg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:BzQ+2sJwOS0=:74GfY7rUx6UHaHrz12fDAN 3SVRsza4Uy0vY9d2HQXsv9zHH43bi2qkcQMvCvOcwZjUl/wlDCxyoezgmu+aTziVYj7NzqGHt BsvnzeQFRiwj4Z2gPqA+ryyalSzSA2kJhyUrP0tJUvztwcekqFb3D3otgdkAjyGMZGOG7s2ZN DyhIPXUSBEus4tAZgx9gXa8RDCv2kOJAntU6aNbTf8sW+YciiWlUb8xTrxd2LvycmLEwAXyv0 kqDX6ydySGYekYUvAwUntMuhmvNvazxjpZDRXdwv/BGyo+CYyvVFEKutOcmvI+U7bI1IvdMOo x4V1MRPTHf1KjlG9rxbTAA9NfVZCeMjnYX2WGcdaejxADb/A74E+boKJ9SL2KC+4BvDE1aHzX Oq0SgzYYMnu2sXgDI03kCjxEHx/7Sbt6V96MBSanwCesL4LeqjB1nZikDM2zI9HLfRQaJT+Sk 9BmFrkZVbCxDOEdundWKTVy3A03mqOQ0FLueiLka4Q30rCmuu2aDuMHp8N61gAh5BYAO4owda CpZlCkc2gWczfF8eD+npU/p+u8rGRuDCCgwtYlQQKhT2QpJliYZ9MPkpuGV8vwwzCimqUvfyT J3Ln/aQ+rRzUoBMFAkL5HlF57Lh4Hjhrfut08ts7IOsVeqVkrie4OtsLB00PiFXcEDey0QRSK HBvPSV6MXT5tvQ0hoq1v4AL43WeQ0Fl/M15gRBsTmmh7NL34Cmy/sgULrfeWhvH5s3GI= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132209 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --uxki5E7WHUgHNjTCge9AcIOKdwnVjP0ci Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EOqLQi6OXieKr7KKQXwehNoKXTsXLCgB9"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: Andreas Schwab , Eli Zaretskii Cc: 26742@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#26742: Display bug with composed strings References: <83inljisik.fsf@gnu.org> <72a56579-8a99-10c6-9c84-edaf954c59c0@live.com> <83d1bri4vg.fsf@gnu.org> <834lx3i1k6.fsf@gnu.org> <8337cni0i7.fsf@gnu.org> <871ss7oz7f.fsf@linux-m68k.org> In-Reply-To: <871ss7oz7f.fsf@linux-m68k.org> --EOqLQi6OXieKr7KKQXwehNoKXTsXLCgB9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-05-02 15:06, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Mai 02 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 >> Also, what happens if you replace 8804 in your test file with 10877? > > Interestingly, this is also shows the effect, even though both > characters are taken from the same font (not the default font). Really? On my machine I get DejaVu sans for one, and DejaVu Sans Mono for= the other (and the effect is indeed observable, but that's consistent wi= th the "multiple fonts" hypothesis) --EOqLQi6OXieKr7KKQXwehNoKXTsXLCgB9-- --uxki5E7WHUgHNjTCge9AcIOKdwnVjP0ci Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZCWd0AAoJEPqg+cTm90wjSEkP/238Pwkm2D0nLfM1Dw17jRX2 AAp5KJaTNPXcfYhxLaDng6Pfj0cvU+YHOnmioGg3oFCTMv1u7Yg3V/W4QpoAlzvj 806G6vev5jY4w/IZz7OmunqrWVwkRbAexJZ2qLv9zstkWj+WRHSnQ7WJ87x4b1qD ZtZtE5d0/+Dg/rYqgfPl2BeKK9by8UhqFVSfvsbnqUQhxK960yaipGX2EQgFL6GR DUc0AOJODGYgFA8HItxEjDsWCrQ4lbbItYNWep3XLt4AMa8xm+xPNkYYi/wxHzdn 8b/2h8b5nFev8Gkn3mpzE5rd/4Is/QVr/MPrdMHtWhwtkvaqc7r8Kz9EcyfrqHYQ 067TF9mBESS5Pp81kj30EX9WMHY8JtHfPYq9gZ5mAblv8viBOPRKc2IdJo57GyDO 0eij8xpVhnH/n1fYZVTPV2nQ3RYt+MNlNYCoiDZneA17+UpRUEh8BZo1Q4YhV/PT uq+zgAxbz/AZy/ndxyKKvFU8LGdjJ+RpOQtjNLPz/YjPYmAw5rvIa7i05ysoBeGg +RC8shIco2GE95LQ9+8Ox044KmpRr7Z2maEQFlxM+mfpYSr64UeLTQVyII20GZHO uow/iYld3B8lcDl+0gss9eqvr38gXkk4te7JVG1WdZXSQ8mUGZvnfmv2brvldBFH LBS8VO0H659fAsEJZpAi =yxd2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uxki5E7WHUgHNjTCge9AcIOKdwnVjP0ci--