From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2ed2999: Improve documentation of new Xref options Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:01:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20210905075953.20536.20920@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210905075955.0F6B720A0A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <6f1fcbee-1825-1219-88fb-e6f28d00ab4d@yandex.ru> <831r62tjf3.fsf@gnu.org> <0eaa7dc7-a3f2-5319-bf09-629f9949e416@yandex.ru> <834kaxsxb8.fsf@gnu.org> <7fe2eafb-e15a-beab-f485-9c80b2913121@yandex.ru> <831r61soqu.fsf@gnu.org> <6c33d3c8-5155-f0fe-ec47-0630d9f3525f@yandex.ru> <83h7ewpmc4.fsf@gnu.org> <6b688b48-eae7-1dbc-3de6-97f071583659@yandex.ru> <838s08peuk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19906"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 07 18:06:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdcG-00051A-2l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 18:06:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53310 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdcE-0000R0-5l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdXp-00012G-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:01:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]:45810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdXj-0000wU-JO; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:01:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id n5so15204197wro.12; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:01:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rKlfsgV955WtfQB9TzLsevhFlIq+pxP4WkAJwOjuFdc=; b=WJ1Jt/cqLT6wYSzeAWCYWNFisc8Iogmvo0fsfpDD2HEy10MYHHROcOFlxSnCd4LLtr dqZrLtdzcr85deXQvolwlMb8driWaZytjQLoZr+8Zkr/U4YpPKsZxWfvpVaD72EDG5dY UPVSkFYEa/L25idoptlArwRuR6O6aC4seOeCKRBaVTIRuAILIUwTETSVrATwqpp0AKlD dh3va+sIJ3sL+wXu3EDzVyR4rCYbqJHLzYxNV1mCy0owIGNGqJng3cDTPJRoRT5gZgSp IsRJpOi5mdq/CSRNz8QcoAR9XDiSU3qx0YMZ+ayP6W/3sl+FSMg0Ir8OjVvz1PTzJiv5 s0WA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rKlfsgV955WtfQB9TzLsevhFlIq+pxP4WkAJwOjuFdc=; b=YL60qycqEzfE2o7uJJMLuNnhb8m8Mihm4ndVfOagbfIxbT9u8qk3OHpzXRU6FHNQaI AlgSUH0cw8fq22qln43JuD3U6PN25yAdpM+7yZX/UWS9kaVsRxsHZgRxiNGS47dqLVgy mH9RRoLzEK923viGltxkFcpQD0QBVSJUZtndx9btPXtd5FAZbJ+2DcijNuSBpneK3TQW 8zIULOLGV69nUNr5ae8rJlTI4nWoberSjMbOMcQxnzRi60Gxjdn1RQAii3SP3T5FVEdl k6XdYPrdPtcU3pORGz0mL+USPGDDqQSyCpQyTpyoY8qCJ85tHVCr6yx3W8nTj7zNIriy 7W+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533epP89MJE+ilw96tjA69zA4a0IUhsCeJZ5T+PAnYuVBDeWwUI4 2v21gP3tOKyaFbO0r6gOnIKm+/ml5j0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCtnVuLTo1B/8gm//4z13kVn6GlwHuRKmjUU3ph56Z9JKsoCCQHxXu+2qvnVANOl00tS27fw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b7c1:: with SMTP id t1mr19283472wre.387.1631030509242; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z1sm2880238wmi.34.2021.09.07.09.01.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:01:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838s08peuk.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::429; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x429.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.332, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274257 Archived-At: On 07.09.2021 18:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> Should we perhaps treat dired-do-find-regexp like we do with >>> dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace, to avoid confusion due to >>> inconsistency? >> dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace is a totally different command, which >> could use an entirely different UI (as soon as someone wrote one). >> >> There is no way to have it obey xref-auto-jump-to-first-xref: it simply >> failed to work without the fix. > I understand. But wouldn't it confuse users that dired-do-find-regexp > obeys the option, while dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace does not? I > though perhaps we should make both not obey. Having dired-do-find-regexp and project-find-regexp behave differently should be more confusing.