From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: issues introduced since 2014-10-20 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:31:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <87mw59ptdj.fsf@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422030709 13522 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2015 16:31:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Shmakov , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 23 17:31:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEh9A-00050E-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:31:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60247 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEh99-0001U3-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:31:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEh8x-0001Tx-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:31:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEh8s-0008HA-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:31:35 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:47643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEh8s-0008Gz-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:31:30 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t0NGVJrc019906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:31:20 GMT Original-Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0NGVJRg006316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:31:19 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0NGVI7k019934; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:31:18 GMT In-Reply-To: <87mw59ptdj.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8.2 (807160) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181684 Archived-At: > > (FWIW: I'm reporting this for a build from 2014-10-20 because I have > > not found a more recent build that I can use at all =E2=80=93 too many= things > > broken.) >=20 > =09Do you care to list the respective bug reports? No promises, > =09but I hope to at least take a look at them. (And should the > =09problem be that no one has bothered to check the proposed > =09patches and push them to Git, =E2=80=93 I now can do it myself.) Sorry, I have not (yet) filed any bug report about this. I hope to, when I have time to narrow things down a bit. One thing I can say (which doesn't mean much out of context, which is why I want to narrow things down) is that thumbifying frames (shrinking them quite a bit, by reducing the font size) now shows them with the wrong height, a height much larger (several times larger) than what it should be. I probably should have been clearer and less alarmist in that parenthetical remark, BTW. The Emacs builds since 10/20 are not really usable by me, in my context. But that does not mean that the problems make it unusable for others. I should have made that clear. Anyway, I will try to find time to narrow things down and report bugs that I see properly. And thanks for following up and offering to look into this.