iso-accents-mode

iso-accents-mode

[fede]

Hi. when I do

M-x iso-accents-mode

I get a [No match].

I found the correct .el file, but where do I put it?

I'm also wondering if iso-accents-mode is for some reason obsolete and
I should be looking for another solution.

Thanks,

Federico

Re: iso-accents-mode

[Joost Kremers]

fede wrote:
> Hi. when I do
>
> M-x iso-accents-mode
>
> I get a [No match].
>
> I found the correct .el file, but where do I put it?

you can put it anywhere you like, but you have to load it.

> I'm also wondering if iso-accents-mode is for some reason obsolete and
> I should be looking for another solution.

I think it is obsolete. Emacs comes with a whole range of input methods. Check
out the info node:

(info "(emacs) Input Methods")

HTH


-- 
Joost Kremers                                      joostkremers@yahoo.com
Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht
EN:SiS(9)

Re: iso-accents-mode

[Ivan Kanis]

fede <fede@hss.caltech.edu> wrote:

> I'm also wondering if iso-accents-mode is for some reason obsolete and
> I should be looking for another solution.

You don't need iso-accents-mode. Hit C-\ and select latin-prefix. To see
all input methods supported by emacs run M-x list-input-methods.
-- 
Ivan
Kanis http://kanis.fr

Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by
definition, not smart enough to debug it.
    -- Brian W. Kernighan 

Re: iso-accents-mode

[fede]

Many thanks Joost and Ivan: latin-prefix works beautifully.

Federico

On Sep 24, 12:01 am, Ivan Kanis <expire-by-2009-09...@kanis.fr> wrote:
> fede <f...@hss.caltech.edu> wrote:
> > I'm also wondering if iso-accents-mode is for some reason obsolete and
> > I should be looking for another solution.
>
> You don't need iso-accents-mode. Hit C-\ and select latin-prefix. To see
> all input methods supported by emacs run M-x list-input-methods.
> --
> Ivan
> Kanishttp://kanis.fr
>
> Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
> Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by
> definition, not smart enough to debug it.
>     -- Brian W. Kernighan