From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gergely Czuczy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28308: Build failure on FreeBSD/aarch64 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:02:18 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2e5f41f7-e005-c28f-c04a-79953a804f71@harmless.hu> <79mv6fr8ea.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1504199039 20064 195.159.176.226 (31 Aug 2017 17:03:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:03:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 Cc: 28308@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 19:03:46 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSsP-00040o-QW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:03:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56776 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSsW-00036d-S5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:03:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSry-0002ub-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSru-0003FM-Pl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSru-0003F9-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSru-0005DH-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gergely Czuczy Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28308 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28308-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28308.150419894819997 (code B ref 28308); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2017 17:02:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSrL-0005CT-Pe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:02:27 -0400 Original-Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([195.56.55.204]:53305) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSrJ-0005CE-NN for 28308@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:02:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84-236-24-10.pool.digikabel.hu ([84.236.24.10] helo=[10.219.16.1]) by marvin.harmless.hu with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.88 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1dnSrD-000293-0y; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:02:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <79mv6fr8ea.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136415 Archived-At: Could you please explain why does it like a duplicate? From my point of view it seems to be a completely different issue. If you check the build failure, it's not failing because of the lack of sbrk(), as I've explicitly mentioned that. It's a different kind of failure. Another difference is, that report was for emacs-25, and mine is for HEAD, the development branch. On 2017. 08. 31. 18:47, Glenn Morris wrote: > This seems to be a duplicate of https://debbugs.gnu.org/24892 ?