From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: eww and bookmarks Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 07:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20200527071850.rgaqnelquirmuzyx@E15-2016.optimum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="14872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Boruch Baum , Emacs-Devel List Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 27 16:41:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdxFS-0003mW-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 16:41:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdxFR-0001mT-4F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdxEn-0000cn-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:46440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdxEm-0006qk-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04REbwtW061280; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:40:52 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=jYbDyHIApvSa81x1fnxPTcpGbfW2HBrmO37pdXAqmrk=; b=l4LpDiEM7qB7HohT7Ozd7Tr4oRsvTqMVEQ7j+LvntT0HXnHJogRj+8kUoUvhRDsyCpUN Ou+/nwUf6xyvhL4miJNYQVrGD4iiyUdGKG3PalYItd7OXAnBwchcyEJzAIqPu4YLe+Sg jSY97j2bmzAY70A0nbrih0pIgc1cjgFX+55Nq++RDuZ1xPS4WT1kKPnwocu3TxcsT1oS 1vkv21M37T6GZO0sTzoqtMXSJU/RKmAKyUwhGabjXl+EtM8JUVy+2IilhcmGOiAS3K6+ i9WBm39kXti4vDnp7ceRt7PDwOSGAPkpH6F/CbJOYHL1cG8cF70/wzJrYN1LeHUyUxpg Qw== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 318xbjyv84-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2020 14:40:52 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04REd2US043861; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:40:52 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 317ddqxa5c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 May 2020 14:40:51 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 04REeoxo005605; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:40:51 GMT In-Reply-To: <20200527071850.rgaqnelquirmuzyx@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5005.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9633 signatures=668686 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005270112 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9633 signatures=668686 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005270112 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/27 10:40:55 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251503 Archived-At: > For tinfoil-hat reasons, I'm hesitant about the idea of having a single > bookmark list for both local and network resources, and both emacs and > non-emacs launching. I don't want a situation where there might be > uncertainty which program is about to be launched or whether the > network > is going to accessed and what follow-on 'stuff' my device will end up > doing. >=20 > That doesn't mean I oppose the notion of a single 'grand unified' > bookmark list, just that I would want some clear indication in advance > of what is about to happen should I open any specific link. >=20 > Maybe what would be sufficient for those concerns would be a pair of > visual cues: one for 'local/network', and a second for > 'emacs/external'. > Then an interested user could query a bookmark's details for further > information, or just click-through. The visual cues might not even need > to take up additional screen space: maybe it would be sufficient to > underline network bookmarks, and to italicize bookmarks that launch > external programs. I'm not sure just what you're replying to, but different bookmark types can be created. So sure, you could have any number of different kinds of bookmarks for URLs or whatever. And, at least with Bookmark+, you can have different types look different in the displayed bookmark list. And you can sort that list by type.