From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please increase default value of message-log-max Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:30:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175979433 6872 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2007 20:57:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jason Spiro , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 07 22:56:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HaHad-0000zt-E8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 22:32:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaHeG-0003n0-Fi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HaHeC-0003mX-Rc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HaHeB-0003mI-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaHeB-0003mF-Mh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HaHaY-0003bn-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HaHYG-0003jA-KP; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:30:24 -0400 X-Spook: Treasury condor Audiotel JPL Verisign LABLINK argus X-Ran: ZpQg;}su@4]C}nG'o@16rzA6s'zJ+%yS#+|_TXMW8r*/Vd=:.Rezm1B]Gnmc0tbkT{QTL[ X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:17:45 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69185 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > Richard Stallman wrote: > >> I am not sure I like the idea of setting message-log-max to 1024, >> but setting it to 100 probably can't do any harm. > > As a data point, I've had it set to 1000 for 3 years, and have never > seen any problems. But, having said that, I suspect it's not important for most people, those who need to can easily change it, so this close to a release just bumping it to 100 (or doing nothing) is a better idea.