From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug in comment-region Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:44 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040609.160802.116374946.wl@gnu.org> <20040609210920.GA12578@fencepost> <20040610.010621.18288090.wl@gnu.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086831453 15952 80.91.224.253 (10 Jun 2004 01:37:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: quarl+dated+1087221580.02c4f1@nospam.quarl.org, quarl@nospam.quarl.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 03:37:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYEVS-00042Y-00 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 03:37:26 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYEVS-0002yQ-00 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 03:37:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYEW7-0007u6-IH for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYEW5-0007t1-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYEW4-0007sK-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYEW4-0007sE-F4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.32.8.202] (helo=TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BYEV8-0008H8-FH; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.160] (may be forged)) by TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id i5A1aoY17800; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:50 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id i5A1ans05789; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:49 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edtmg05.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.17.202]) by mailsv5.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id i5A1ama22063; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg05.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5A1ajXP016552; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:47 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id i5A1aiIm029961; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:44 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 525B846B; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:36:44 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Werner LEMBERG System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <20040610.010621.18288090.wl@gnu.org> (Werner LEMBERG's message of "Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:06:21 +0200 (CEST)") Original-Lines: 17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24788 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24788 Werner LEMBERG writes: > I haven't yet used comment-dwim, so I won't say something about this > function. But IMHO it is a strange idea to have `C-u something' do > exactly the opposite of `something'. Not at all. Indeed, it's stunningly natural. > And I don't agree with your conclusion that the several meanings of > C-u for `comment-region' are `much more useful'. For me, they are > useful for `uncomment-region' only. Clearly a matter of opinion; I've made mine clear (I really like the way the comment-foo functions work currently). -Miles --=20 =BC=AB=A4=E9=A4=F2=B6=F5=A4=CB=A4=B7=A4=C6=A1=A2=BF=B4=A4=F2=B3=AB=A4=AF=BB= =FE=A1=A2=C6=BB=A4=CF=B3=AB=A4=AB=A4=EC=A4=EB