From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-partial too costly ? Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:31:35 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87k647501r.fsf@lrde.org> <87u03amwp2.fsf@lrde.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158240904 27089 80.91.229.2 (14 Sep 2006 13:35:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 14 15:34:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNrMU-0008TD-NO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:34:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNrMU-0001CC-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GNrLo-0000qJ-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GNrLm-0000ol-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNrLm-0000oW-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [203.180.232.81] (helo=mgate01.necel.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GNrNh-0004UN-20; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:35:53 -0400 Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com (relay31 [10.29.19.54]) by mgate01.necel.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8ECCNqO018633; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:33:32 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:33:32 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:33:32 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 05A4C468; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:31:36 +0900 (JST) Original-To: michael@cadilhac.name (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <87u03amwp2.fsf@lrde.org> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac's message of "Thu\, 14 Sep 2006 14\:58\:33 +0200") Original-Lines: 17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59838 Archived-At: michael@cadilhac.name (Micha=EBl Cadilhac) writes: > Thanks for testing! Did you use a particular keyboard rate? With the > default X one, I don't have this problem. Ah, no. If I use your "very fast" kbd repeat rate I do see the issue. I also notice: * It only happens if font-lock is turned on (I guess just slowdown from font-locking?) * It only happens with C-n, not C-p. C-p is fast with no pauses (regardless of font-lock status). -Miles --=20 I'd rather be consing.