From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.fortran,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:23:06 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20061030211304.GB7761@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <05DA20E5-B163-4A84-A366-67C848155E8A@gmail.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162348082 26125 80.91.229.2 (1 Nov 2006 02:28:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 02:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: FX Coudert , fortran@gcc.gnu.org, Angelo.Graziosi@roma1.infn.it, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: fortran-return-15374-gcgf-fortran=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 01 03:27:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcgf-fortran@gmane.org Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf5pZ-00013v-JI for gcgf-fortran@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 03:27:53 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 9242 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2006 02:27:50 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 9232 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2006 02:27:50 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Original-Received: from mgate03.necel.com (HELO mgate03.necel.com) (203.180.232.83) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:27:48 +0000 Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com (relay31 [10.29.19.54]) by mgate03.necel.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kA115fol018467; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:27:45 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:27:45 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:27:45 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 9CCA13B5; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:23:06 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue\, 31 Oct 2006 21\:14\:04 -0500") Original-Lines: 16 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Original-Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15343 gmane.emacs.devel:61526 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > In the case you're talking about, it is certainly better to generate 3 > different error messages, one for each of those error loci, using the > GNU standard format to indicate them. And in fact, that's what the _existing_ gfortran code seems to do: it emits 3 separate "loci" lines (using their non-standard format for the file/line-number), finally followed by the text of the error message. As far as I can tell, Alfred's one line (!) patch would make things work perfectly using the standard format. -Miles -- Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement)